From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
rhkernel-list@redhat.com, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RHEL 8.3 BZ 1768622 PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 11:18:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519091822.GA4143612@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519085852.GE20516@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:58:52AM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> I'm marking this as superseded by pwid 303977
>
> http://patchwork.lab.bos.redhat.com/patch/303977/
>
> which was included in kernel-4.18.0-196.el8
>
> commit 9751522d92195bc64883c71e2bee8ed0fcbc5007
> Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon Apr 20 15:20:04 2020 -0400
>
> [x86] kvm: x86: use raw clock values consistently
>
> Message-id: <20200420152004.933168-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Patchwork-id: 303977
> Patchwork-instance: patchwork
> O-Subject: [RHEL8.3 virt PATCH v2 312/614] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently
> Bugzilla: 1813987
> RH-Acked-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> RH-Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> RH-Acked-by: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@redhat.com>
>
> Note there is a difference between yours and Vitaly's patch in the
> following hunk
>
> +@@ -1656,6 +1656,18 @@ static void update_pvclock_gtod(struct timekeeper *tk)
>
> write_seqcount_end(&vdata->seq);
> }
> @@ -14,12 +16,12 @@
> +static s64 get_kvmclock_base_ns(void)
> +{
> + /* Master clock not used, so we can just use CLOCK_BOOTTIME. */
> -+ return ktime_get_boottime_ns();
> ++ return ktime_get_boot_ns();
> +}
> #endif
>
>
> This is in !CONFIG_X86_64 path, so I'm not sure how much we care about
> this. Anyway Vitaly's patch corrects this, because
> rhel does not have upstream commit 9285ec4c8b61d4930a575081abeba2cd4f449a74
Gotta love private git repo discussions on a public mailing list :)
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200518191516.165550666@fuller.cnet>
2020-05-18 19:15 ` [RHEL 8.3 BZ 1768622 PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: use raw clock values consistently Marcelo Tosatti
2020-05-19 8:58 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2020-05-19 9:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-05-19 9:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519091822.GA4143612@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkernel-list@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.