From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: micron: Adapt the PAGE READ flow to constraint controllers
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:39:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519103919.50f4417e@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519074639.23777-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Tue, 19 May 2020 09:46:39 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> There are controllers not able to just read data cycles on the
> bus. There are controllers not able to do a change column.
>
> If we want to support both, we need to check which operation is
> supported first. This is the exact same mechanism that is in use for
> parameter page reads (ONFI/JEDEC) as the same problem occurs.
>
> Speed testing does not show any throughput penalty so we do not
> optimize more than that. However it is likely that, in the future, a
> more robust and exhaustive test will run at boot time to avoid
> re-checking what is supported and what is not at every call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
This looks good to me, just one thing to address below and you can add
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> index b2b047b245f4..bbd0ffbae19a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status,
> struct micron_nand *micron = nand_get_manufacturer_data(chip);
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> unsigned int step, max_bitflips = 0;
> + bool use_datain = false;
> int ret;
>
> if (!(status & NAND_ECC_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED)) {
> @@ -211,8 +212,18 @@ static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status,
> * in non-raw mode, even if the user did not request those bytes.
> */
> if (!oob_required) {
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize,
> - false, false);
Can we add a comment explaining what we're doing here (basically a
condensed version of the commit message).
> + if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip) ||
> + !nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize, false,
> + true))
> + use_datain = true;
> +
> + if (use_datain)
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false, false);
> + else
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, mtd->writesize,
> + chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -285,6 +296,7 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> + bool use_datain = false;
> u8 status;
> int ret, max_bitflips = 0;
>
> @@ -300,14 +312,28 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = nand_exit_status_op(chip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
Same here.
> + if (!nand_has_exec_op(chip) ||
> + !nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false, true))
> + use_datain = true;
>
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false, false);
> - if (!ret && oob_required)
> - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize,
> - false, false);
> + if (use_datain) {
> + ret = nand_exit_status_op(chip);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false,
> + false);
> + if (!ret && oob_required)
> + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false, false);
> + } else {
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, 0, buf, mtd->writesize,
> + false);
> + if (!ret && oob_required)
> + ret = nand_change_read_column_op(chip, mtd->writesize,
> + chip->oob_poi,
> + mtd->oobsize, false);
> + }
>
> if (chip->ecc.strength == 4)
> max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(chip, status,
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 7:46 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: micron: Adapt the PAGE READ flow to constraint controllers Miquel Raynal
2020-05-19 8:39 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-05-19 12:17 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519103919.50f4417e@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.