From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Roman Kagan" <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] block: consolidate blocksize properties consistency checks
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:52:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520155221.GF5192@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+75-U0SsdBeK-6gzjrjeBN099FnM15_qU6JZ2Fy6H8aNA1uA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 20.05.2020 um 10:59 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > > be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
> > > smaller than logical block; min_io_size, opt_io_size, and
> > > discard_granularity must be a multiple of a logical block.
> > >
> > > To ensure these requirements are met, add corresponding consistency
> > > checks to blkconf_blocksizes, adjusting its signature to communicate
> > > possible error to the caller. Also remove the now redundant consistency
> > > checks from the specific devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>
> > > ---
> > > v4: new patch
> > >
> > > include/hw/block/block.h | 2 +-
> > > hw/block/block.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > hw/block/fdc.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/block/nvme.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 7 +------
> > > hw/ide/qdev.c | 5 ++++-
> > > hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 10 +++-------
> > > hw/usb/dev-storage.c | 5 ++++-
> > > tests/qemu-iotests/172.out | 2 +-
> > > 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/block/block.h b/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > index d7246f3862..784953a237 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/block/block.h
> > > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ bool blk_check_size_and_read_all(BlockBackend *blk, void *buf, hwaddr size,
> > > bool blkconf_geometry(BlockConf *conf, int *trans,
> > > unsigned cyls_max, unsigned heads_max, unsigned secs_max,
> > > Error **errp);
> > > -void blkconf_blocksizes(BlockConf *conf);
> > > +bool blkconf_blocksizes(BlockConf *conf, Error **errp);
>
> Maybe rename blkconf_validate_blocksizes()?
It does more than validating. It also assigns defaults or guesses
settings from the host file.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 8:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] virtio-blk: store opt_io_size with correct size Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:48 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-20 21:11 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 15:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 20:34 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] block: consolidate blocksize properties consistency checks Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 8:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 15:52 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-05-20 15:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 21:31 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 8:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 9:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-20 21:45 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-20 15:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-20 21:50 ` Roman Kagan
2020-05-25 15:20 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520155221.GF5192@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.