From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: sdf@google.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] flow_dissector: Drop BPF flow dissector prog ref on netns cleanup
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521104214.6a1a4f9c@toad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520174000.GA49942@google.com>
On Wed, 20 May 2020 10:40:00 -0700
sdf@google.com wrote:
> > +static void __net_exit flow_dissector_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_prog *attached;
> > +
> > + /* We don't lock the update-side because there are no
> > + * references left to this netns when we get called. Hence
> > + * there can be no attach/detach in progress.
> > + */
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + attached = rcu_dereference(net->flow_dissector_prog);
> > + if (attached) {
> > + RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->flow_dissector_prog, NULL);
> > + bpf_prog_put(attached);
> > + }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +}
> I wonder, should we instead refactor existing
> skb_flow_dissector_bpf_prog_detach to accept netns (instead of attr)
> can call that here? Instead of reimplementing it (I don't think we
> care about mutex lock/unlock efficiency here?). Thoughts?
I wanted to be nice to container-heavy workloads where network
namespaces get torn down frequently and in parallel and avoid
locking a global mutex. OTOH we already do it today, for instance in
devlink pre_exit callback.
In our case I think there is a way to have the cake and it eat too:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200521083435.560256-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/
Thanks for reviewing it,
-jkbs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 17:22 [PATCH bpf] flow_dissector: Drop BPF flow dissector prog ref on netns cleanup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-20 17:40 ` sdf
2020-05-21 0:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-21 8:42 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-05-21 19:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-22 0:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-22 8:22 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521104214.6a1a4f9c@toad \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppenkov@google.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.