From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Gupta, Nidhi1" <nidhi1.gupta@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Keep signal helpers enabled after a failed interruptible subtest
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 20:15:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521144504.GG31478@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E7C9878FBA1C6D42A1CA3F62AEB6945F8250CE1A@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com>
On 2020-05-21 at 19:52:34 +0530, Shankar, Uma wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: igt-dev <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Anshuman
> > Gupta
> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 6:33 PM
> > To: Deak, Imre <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Gupta, Nidhi1 <nidhi1.gupta@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Keep signal helpers enabled
> > after a failed interruptible subtest
> >
> > On 2020-05-19 at 18:29:56 +0530, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > For the duration of all the interruptible subtests the signal helper
> > > is assumed to stay running after each subtest, both in case the
> > > subtest passes or aborts with a failure. So make sure we don't leave
> > > the signal helper suspended in case igt_assert() aborts.
> > >
> > > References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1883
> > > Fixes: 60e8be7ccc72 ("tests/kms_flip: Retry test in case of a DP/HDMI
> > > link reset")
> > > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Nidhi Gupta <nidhi1.gupta@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Looks good to me,
> > But i have some doubts regarding the reported failure in issue 1883.
> > > ---
> > > tests/kms_flip.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c index
> > > 46bfc5858..7bf6958af 100755
> > > --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> > > @@ -1325,10 +1325,15 @@ retry:
> > > * reset event, which the driver signals with a hotplug event.
> > > */
> > > if (!state_ok) {
> > > + bool hotplug_detected;
> > > +
> > > igt_suspend_signal_helper();
> > > - igt_assert(!retried && igt_hotplug_detected(mon, 3));
> > AFAIU correctly the test didn't received any HOTPLUG uevent due to any
> > wait_event_interruptible() waitqueue in driver blocking it till 3 seconds, if this
> > waitqueue in kernel get interrupted by SIGCONT signal, which is primarly signal
> > helper in this igt, then igt_hotplug_detected() will detect a hotplug. Hope my
> > understading here is correct here.
>
> Here since we have suspended the signal handler which will ignore or mask any interrupts,
> we need to ensure to resume it before we assert.
IMHO igt_suspend_signal_helper send a SIGSTOP to signal helper process, which will stop
the signal helper execution, which was actually signalling SIGCONT to parent process at 500Hz
intervel.
I am not able to see if it masks any interrupt here.
Please correct me if i am wrong here.
I am interested here to know why it has not received HOTPLUG event for a period of 3 second,
what was really blocking it from kernel driver.
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Anshuman Gupta.
> > > + if (!retried)
> > > + hotplug_detected = igt_hotplug_detected(mon, 3);
> > > igt_resume_signal_helper();
> > >
> > > + igt_assert(!retried && hotplug_detected);
> > > +
> > > igt_debug("Retrying after a hotplug event\n");
> > > retried = true;
> > > memset(&o->vblank_state, 0, sizeof(o->vblank_state));
> > > --
> > > 2.23.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > igt-dev mailing list
> > > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 12:59 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Keep signal helpers enabled after a failed interruptible subtest Imre Deak
2020-05-19 15:12 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for " Patchwork
2020-05-19 15:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-19 22:21 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-05-20 7:17 ` Imre Deak
2020-05-20 8:20 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-05-20 8:17 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-22 8:35 ` Imre Deak
2020-05-21 13:02 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Anshuman Gupta
2020-05-21 14:22 ` Shankar, Uma
2020-05-21 14:45 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2020-05-21 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2020-05-21 15:35 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-05-21 14:06 ` Shankar, Uma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521144504.GG31478@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nidhi1.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.