From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: dac: ad5592r-base: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:38:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521193825.76c36f8a@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520120207.46034-1-sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
On Wed, 20 May 2020 15:02:01 +0300
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com> wrote:
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock on the device's state structure.
> This also removes unused iio_dev pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> index e2110113e884..410e90e5f75f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static void ad5592r_gpio_cleanup(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> static int ad5592r_reset(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> {
> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> - struct iio_dev *iio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
>
> gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(st->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> @@ -166,10 +165,10 @@ static int ad5592r_reset(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> udelay(1);
> gpiod_set_value(gpio, 1);
> } else {
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> /* Writing this magic value resets the device */
> st->ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_RESET, 0xdac);
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> }
>
> udelay(250);
> @@ -197,7 +196,6 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> const struct ad5592r_rw_ops *ops = st->ops;
> int ret;
> unsigned i;
> - struct iio_dev *iio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(st);
> u8 pulldown = 0, tristate = 0, dac = 0, adc = 0;
> u16 read_back;
>
> @@ -247,7 +245,7 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> }
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> /* Pull down unused pins to GND */
> ret = ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_PULLDOWN, pulldown);
> @@ -285,7 +283,7 @@ static int ad5592r_set_channel_modes(struct ad5592r_state *st)
> ret = -EIO;
>
> err_unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -314,11 +312,11 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> if (!chan->output)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> ret = st->ops->write_dac(st, chan->channel, val);
> if (!ret)
> st->cached_dac[chan->channel] = val;
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> if (chan->type == IIO_VOLTAGE) {
> @@ -333,12 +331,12 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> else
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> ret = st->ops->reg_read(st, AD5592R_REG_CTRL,
> &st->cached_gp_ctrl);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -360,7 +358,7 @@ static int ad5592r_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>
> ret = st->ops->reg_write(st, AD5592R_REG_CTRL,
> st->cached_gp_ctrl);
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -382,7 +380,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>
> switch (m) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (!chan->output) {
> ret = st->ops->read_adc(st, chan->channel, &read_val);
> @@ -419,7 +417,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> } else {
> int mult;
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (chan->output)
> mult = !!(st->cached_gp_ctrl &
> @@ -437,7 +435,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> ret = ad5592r_get_vref(st);
>
> - mutex_lock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>
> if (st->cached_gp_ctrl & AD5592R_REG_CTRL_ADC_RANGE)
> *val = (-34365 * 25) / ret;
> @@ -450,7 +448,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> }
>
> unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&iio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -625,6 +623,8 @@ int ad5592r_probe(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> iio_dev->info = &ad5592r_info;
> iio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>
> + mutex_init(&st->lock);
> +
> ad5592r_init_scales(st, ad5592r_get_vref(st));
>
> ret = ad5592r_reset(st);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> index 4774e4cd9c11..23dac2f1ff8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct ad5592r_state {
> struct regulator *reg;
> struct gpio_chip gpiochip;
> struct mutex gpio_lock; /* Protect cached gpio_out, gpio_val, etc. */
> + struct mutex lock;
> unsigned int num_channels;
> const struct ad5592r_rw_ops *ops;
> int scale_avail[2][2];
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 6:18 [PATCH] iio: dac: ad5592r-base: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Sergiu Cuciurean
2020-05-20 8:46 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-05-20 12:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergiu Cuciurean
2020-05-21 18:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521193825.76c36f8a@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com \
--cc=stefan.popa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.