All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: call statx directly
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 01:50:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200522005053.GK23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1590106777-5826-3-git-send-email-bijan.mottahedeh@oracle.com>

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:19:37PM -0700, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
> Calling statx directly both simplifies the interface and avoids potential
> incompatibilities between sync and async invokations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 53 +++++++----------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 12284ea..0540961 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -427,7 +427,10 @@ struct io_open {
>  	union {
>  		unsigned		mask;
>  	};
> -	struct filename			*filename;
> +	union {
> +		struct filename		*filename;
> +		const char __user	*fname;
> +	};

NAK.  io_uring is already has ridiculous amount of multiplexing,
but this kind of shit is right out.

And frankly, the more I look at it, the more I want to rip
struct io_open out.  This kind of trashcan structures has
caused tons of headache pretty much every time we had those.
Don't do it.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-22  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22  0:19 [PATCH 0/2] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-22  0:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] statx: allow the system call to be invoked from the kernel Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-22  0:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-22  0:50   ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-05-22  0:52     ` Al Viro
2020-05-22  1:21       ` Al Viro
2020-05-22  1:20     ` Bijan Mottahedeh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200522005053.GK23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bijan.mottahedeh@oracle.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.