From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
miklos@szeredi.hu, tj@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: Writeback bug causing writeback stalls
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:31:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525073140.GI14199@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB0TPYGJ6WkaKLoqQhsxa2FQ4s-jYKkDe1BDJ89CE_QUM_aBVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat 23-05-20 10:15:20, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> Jaegeuk wondered whether callers of write_inode_now() should hold
> i_rwsem, and whether that would also prevent this problem. Some
> existing callers of write_inode_now() do, eg ntfs and hfs:
>
> hfs_file_fsync()
> inode_lock(inode);
>
> /* sync the inode to buffers */
> ret = write_inode_now(inode, 0);
>
> but there are also some that don't (eg fat, fuse, orangefs).
Well, most importantly filesystems like ext4, xfs, btrfs don't hold i_rwsem
when writing back inode and that's deliberate because of performance. We
don't want to block writes (or event reads in case of XFS) for the inode
during writeback.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 9:57 Writeback bug causing writeback stalls Martijn Coenen
2020-05-22 14:41 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-22 15:23 ` Martijn Coenen
2020-05-22 15:36 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-23 8:15 ` Martijn Coenen
2020-05-25 7:31 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-05-27 8:14 ` Martijn Coenen
2020-05-29 15:20 ` Jan Kara
2020-05-29 19:37 ` Martijn Coenen
2020-06-01 9:09 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-02 12:16 ` Martijn Coenen
[not found] ` <20200524140522.14196-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-05-25 7:38 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200525073140.GI14199@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.