From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com, calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/11] net: phy: Handle c22 regs presence better
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 01:46:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525234623.GG768009@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <269de1a4-57cf-b175-3184-2f4604255bf7@arm.com>
> Right, which is what I sort of expected. Because its falling back to a
> device list of 0xFFFFFFFF, which means probe every single MMD.
>
> Combined with the lack of filtering means that your getting a bunch of MMD
> IDs that potentially are invalid, along with any that happen to be valid.
> Its that behavior (and some others) which were what blew this set up from a
> couple lines of tweaks into this mess.
>
> I don't really see a way to guess at all the "wrong" ids that are being
> pushed into the system. Which is why I started to think about a "strict"
> mode later in the set. Maybe at this point the only way around some of these
> bugs/side effects/etc is just a second c45 probe routine if we don't think
> its possible to implement a variable strictness scanner in this code path
> without losing phys that previously were detected.
Hi Jeremy
I really think we need to find one of those boards which have a
cortina and see what it actually does. Can you get in contact with NXP
and see if they can find one?
Thanks
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 21:30 [RFC 00/11] Make C45 autoprobe more robust Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 01/11] net: phy: Don't report success if devices weren't found Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 18:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 2:46 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 21:02 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 21:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 21:59 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 02/11] net: phy: Simplify MMD device list termination Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 2:48 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 8:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 03/11] net: phy: refactor c45 phy identification sequence Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 15:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-23 17:16 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 17:32 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 19:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-23 18:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-23 19:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-23 20:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 2:37 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 04/11] net: phy: Handle c22 regs presence better Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 18:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 3:34 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 10:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 21:51 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 22:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 22:22 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 23:22 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 23:42 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:46 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-05-25 23:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 23:16 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 22:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-25 22:17 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-25 23:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 23:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-25 23:46 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 23:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 05/11] net: phy: Scan the entire MMD device space Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 06/11] net: phy: Hoist no phy detected state Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 07/11] net: phy: reset invalid phy reads of 0 back to 0xffffffff Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 18:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 4:20 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 8:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 08/11] net: phy: Allow mdio buses to auto-probe c45 devices Jeremy Linton
2020-05-24 14:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-25 4:28 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 8:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-25 13:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-25 22:09 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-25 22:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 09/11] net: phy: Refuse to consider phy_id=0 a valid phy Jeremy Linton
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 10/11] net: example acpize xgmac_mdio Jeremy Linton
2020-05-23 18:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-22 21:30 ` [RFC 11/11] net: example xgmac enable extended scanning Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200525234623.GG768009@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.