All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/25] iio:imu:st_lsm6dsx Fix alignment and data leak issues
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 09:58:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526075838.GC339643@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525170628.503283-13-jic23@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4766 bytes --]

> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> 
> One of a class of bugs pointed out by Lars in a recent review.
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp assumes the buffer used is aligned
> to the size of the timestamp (8 bytes).  This is not guaranteed in
> this driver which uses an array of smaller elements on the stack.
> As Lars also noted this anti pattern can involve a leak of data to
> userspace and that indeed can happen here.  We close both issues by
> moving to a set of suitable structures in the iio_priv() data.
> 
> This data is allocated with kzalloc so no data can leak apart from
> previous readings.
> 
> There has been a lot of churn in this driver, so likely backports
> may be needed for stable.
> 
> Fixes: 290a6ce11d93 ("iio: imu: add support to lsm6dsx driver")
> Reported-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h       |  5 ++++
>  .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c    | 27 ++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> index b56df409ed0f..5bc724eadc83 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> @@ -411,6 +411,11 @@ struct st_lsm6dsx_hw {
>  	const struct st_lsm6dsx_settings *settings;
>  
>  	struct iio_mount_matrix orientation;
> +	/* Ensure natural alignment of buffer elements */
> +	struct {
> +		__le16 channels[3];
> +		s64 ts;
> +	} gyro_scan, acc_scan, ext_scan;
>  };
>  
>  static __maybe_unused const struct iio_event_spec st_lsm6dsx_event = {
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> index afd00daeefb2..9bcffbfac797 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> @@ -341,9 +341,6 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  	int err, sip, acc_sip, gyro_sip, ts_sip, ext_sip, read_len, offset;
>  	u16 fifo_len, pattern_len = hw->sip * ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;
>  	u16 fifo_diff_mask = hw->settings->fifo_ops.fifo_diff.mask;
> -	u8 gyro_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
> -	u8 acc_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
> -	u8 ext_buff[ST_LSM6DSX_IIO_BUFF_SIZE];
>  	bool reset_ts = false;
>  	__le16 fifo_status;
>  	s64 ts = 0;
> @@ -404,18 +401,21 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  
>  		while (acc_sip > 0 || gyro_sip > 0 || ext_sip > 0) {
>  			if (gyro_sip > 0 && !(sip % gyro_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(gyro_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->gyro_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->gyro_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

what about doing?

offset += sizeof(hw->gyro_scan.channels)

it seems easier to follow, what do you think?

>  			}
>  			if (acc_sip > 0 && !(sip % acc_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(acc_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->acc_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->acc_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

same here

>  			}
>  			if (ext_sip > 0 && !(sip % ext_sensor->decimator)) {
> -				memcpy(ext_buff, &hw->buff[offset],
> -				       ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE);
> +				memcpy(hw->ext_scan.channels,
> +				       &hw->buff[offset],
> +				       sizeof(hw->ext_scan.channels));
>  				offset += ST_LSM6DSX_SAMPLE_SIZE;

same here

Regards,
Lorenzo

>  			}
>  
> @@ -446,19 +446,22 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  			if (gyro_sip > 0 && !(sip % gyro_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO],
> -					gyro_buff, gyro_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->gyro_scan,
> +					gyro_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				gyro_sip--;
>  			}
>  			if (acc_sip > 0 && !(sip % acc_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC],
> -					acc_buff, acc_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->acc_scan,
> +					acc_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				acc_sip--;
>  			}
>  			if (ext_sip > 0 && !(sip % ext_sensor->decimator)) {
>  				iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(
>  					hw->iio_devs[ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0],
> -					ext_buff, ext_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
> +					&hw->ext_scan,
> +					ext_sensor->ts_ref + ts);
>  				ext_sip--;
>  			}
>  			sip++;
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-25 17:06 [PATCH 00/25] IIO: 2nd set of timestamp alignment fixes Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/25] iio:light:si1145: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/25] iio:light:max44000 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/25] iio:light:rpr0521 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/25] iio:light:st_uvis25 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:55   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-05-26 16:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-06-07 14:37       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/25] iio:light:ltr501 Fix timestamp alignment issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/25] iio:magnetometer:ak8974: Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  9:24   ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-07 14:43     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/25] iio:magnetometer:ak8975 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  9:24   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 16:50     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/25] iio:magnetometer:mag3110 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/25] iio:humidity:hdc100x " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 19:31   ` Matt Ranostay
2020-06-07 14:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/25] iio:humidity:hts221 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:52   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-07 14:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/25] iio:imu:bmi160 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 12/25] iio:imu:st_lsm6dsx " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26  7:58   ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2020-06-07 15:07     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 13/25] iio:imu:inv_mpu6050 Fix dma and ts " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 18:44   ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2020-05-26 16:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 14/25] iio:pressure:ms5611 Fix buffer element alignment Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 15/25] iio:pressure:mpl3115 Force alignment of buffer Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 16/25] iio:adc:ti-adc081c Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 17/25] iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 18/25] iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 Tidy up endian types Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 19/25] iio:adc:ti-ads1015 Fix buffer element alignment Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26  8:11     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-05-26  9:15       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 16:43         ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 17:06           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-26 19:17             ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 21:03               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 11:41                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-27 12:37                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 14:06                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-05-27 14:43                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 20/25] iio:adc:ti-ads124s08 Fix alignment and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 21/25] iio:adc:ti-ads8688 Fix alignment and potential data leak issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 22/25] iio:adc:ti-adc0832 Fix alignment issue with timestamp Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 23/25] iio:adc:ti-adc12138 " Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 24/25] iio:adc:ina2xx Fix timestamp alignment issue Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 25/25] iio:adc:max1118 Fix alignment of timestamp and data leak issues Jonathan Cameron
2020-05-26 17:02 ` [PATCH 00/25] IIO: 2nd set of timestamp alignment fixes Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526075838.GC339643@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.