From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 13:15:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526111512.GC333164@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525142300.GK14034@kernel.org>
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:23:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:42:05AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > hi,
> > changes for using metric result in another metric seem
> > to change lot of core metric code, so it's better we
> > have some more tests before we do that.
> >
> > Sending as RFC as it's still alive and you guys might
> > have some other idea of how to do this.
> >
> > Also available in here:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> > perf/fixes
>
> I applied the first three patches, will wait a bit for Ian and others to
> have some time to look at it, but one thing I thought was that instead
> of having parse_state->fake_pmu as a bool, you could have it as a
> pointer to the fake pmu, this way we would do away with that static
> thing in the middle of the parsing code.
>
> +static int check_id(const char *id)
> +{
> + struct parse_events_error error;
> + struct evlist *evlist;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Numbers are always valid. */
> + if (is_number(id))
> + return 0;
> +
> + evlist = evlist__new();
> + if (!evlist)
> + return -1;
> +
> + memset(&error, 0, sizeof(error));
> + ret = parse_events_fake(evlist, id, &error);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_debug("str : %s\n", error.str);
> + pr_debug("help : %s\n", error.help);
> + pr_debug("first_str : %s\n", error.first_str);
> + pr_debug("first_help : %s\n", error.first_help);
> + }
> +
> + evlist__delete(evlist);
> + free(error.str);
> + free(error.help);
> + free(error.first_str);
> + free(error.first_help);
> + return ret;
> +}
>
>
> Would read:
>
> struct perf_pmu fake = { 0, };
> .
> .
> .
> ret = parse_events_fake_pmu(evlist, id, &fake, &error);
hi,
ok I'll check, but what I'd like to keep is to have the fake pmu
defined in just one place, I was initialy thinking to put it on
the list of pmus, but then it'd appear in other places we dont want,
like perf list ;-)
> .
> .
> .
>
>
> That also renames parse_events_fake() to parse_events_fake_pmu().
ok, thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-24 22:42 [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 01/14] " Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 02/14] perf tools: Do not pass avg to generic_metric Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 03/14] perf tools: Add struct parse_events_state pointer to scanner Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 04/14] perf tools: Add fake pmu support Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 7:22 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 9:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 05/14] perf tools: Add parse_events_fake interface Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 7:28 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 9:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-06-01 15:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 06/14] perf tests: Add another pmu-events tests Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 7:44 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 13:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 16:23 ` Ian Rogers
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 07/14] perf tools: Factor out parse_groups function Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 08/14] perf tools: Add metricgroup__parse_groups_test function Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 09/14] perf tools: Add fake_pmu to parse_events function Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 10/14] perf tools: Add map " Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 11/14] perf tools: Factor out prepare_metric function Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 12/14] perf tools: Add test_generic_metric function Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 13/14] perf tests: Add parse metric test for ipc metric Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 7:55 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 13:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 16:12 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 15:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-06-01 15:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-24 22:42 ` [PATCH 14/14] perf tests: Add parse metric test for frontend metric Jiri Olsa
2020-06-01 8:06 ` Ian Rogers
2020-06-01 15:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-05-25 12:06 ` [RFC 00/14] perf tests: Check on subtest for user specified test Michael Petlan
2020-05-25 12:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-25 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-05-26 11:15 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200526111512.GC333164@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.