From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/15] xfrm: do pskb_pull properly in __xfrm_transport_prep
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529110408.6349-3-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529110408.6349-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
For transport mode, when ipv6 nexthdr is set, the packet format might
be like:
----------------------------------------------------
| | dest | | | | ESP | ESP |
| IP6 hdr| opts.| ESP | TCP | Data | Trailer | ICV |
----------------------------------------------------
and in __xfrm_transport_prep():
pskb_pull(skb, skb->mac_len + sizeof(ip6hdr) + x->props.header_len);
it will pull the data pointer to the wrong position, as it missed the
nexthdrs/dest opts.
This patch is to fix it by using:
pskb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + x->props.header_len);
as we can be sure transport_header points to ESP header at that moment.
It also fixes a panic when packets with ipv6 nexthdr are sent over
esp6 transport mode:
[ 100.473845] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4325!
[ 100.478517] RIP: 0010:__skb_to_sgvec+0x252/0x260
[ 100.494355] Call Trace:
[ 100.494829] skb_to_sgvec+0x11/0x40
[ 100.495492] esp6_output_tail+0x12e/0x550 [esp6]
[ 100.496358] esp6_xmit+0x1d5/0x260 [esp6_offload]
[ 100.498029] validate_xmit_xfrm+0x22f/0x2e0
[ 100.499604] __dev_queue_xmit+0x589/0x910
[ 100.502928] ip6_finish_output2+0x2a5/0x5a0
[ 100.503718] ip6_output+0x6c/0x120
[ 100.505198] xfrm_output_resume+0x4bf/0x530
[ 100.508683] xfrm6_output+0x3a/0xc0
[ 100.513446] inet6_csk_xmit+0xa1/0xf0
[ 100.517335] tcp_sendmsg+0x27/0x40
[ 100.517977] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x60
[ 100.518648] __sys_sendto+0xee/0x160
Fixes: c35fe4106b92 ("xfrm: Add mode handlers for IPsec on layer 2")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 6cc7f7f1dd68..f50d1f97cf8e 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -25,12 +25,10 @@ static void __xfrm_transport_prep(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct xfrm_offload *xo = xfrm_offload(skb);
skb_reset_mac_len(skb);
- pskb_pull(skb, skb->mac_len + hsize + x->props.header_len);
-
- if (xo->flags & XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT) {
- skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
+ if (xo->flags & XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT)
skb->transport_header -= x->props.header_len;
- }
+
+ pskb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + x->props.header_len);
}
static void __xfrm_mode_tunnel_prep(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 11:03 pull request (net): ipsec 2020-05-29 Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfrm: allow to accept packets with ipv6 NEXTHDR_HOP in xfrm_input Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/15] esp6: get the right proto for transport mode in esp6_gso_encap Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfrm: remove the xfrm_state_put call becofe going to out_reset Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfrm: fix error in comment Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfrm: espintcp: save and call old ->sk_destruct Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 07/15] esp6: support ipv6 nexthdrs process for beet gso segment Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 08/15] esp4: " Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfrm: call xfrm_output_gso when inner_protocol is set in xfrm_output Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 10/15] ip_vti: receive ipip packet by calling ip_tunnel_rcv Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfrm interface: fix oops when deleting a x-netns interface Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 12/15] esp6: calculate transport_header correctly when sel.family != AF_INET6 Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 13/15] esp4: improve xfrm4_beet_gso_segment() to be more readable Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfrm: fix a NULL-ptr deref in xfrm_local_error Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 20:06 ` pull request (net): ipsec 2020-05-29 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529110408.6349-3-steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.