From: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 19:55:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529175544.GA3766151@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526122133.GA1454440@x1>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Drew Fustini wrote:
> Hello Haojian and Linus,
>
> For pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c,
> I see that num_maps is set to 2 if PCS_HAS_PINCONF is enabled:
>
> 1057 if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
> 1058 res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
> 1059 if (res)
> 1060 goto free_pingroups;
> 1061 *num_maps = 2;
> 1062 } else {
> 1063 *num_maps = 1;
> 1064 }
> 1065 mutex_unlock(&pcs->mutex);
>
> git blame shows me that came from 9dddb4df90d13:
> "pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"
>
> Would you be able to provide any insight as to num_maps needs to be 2
> when pinconf is enabled?
>
> thank you,
> drew
The BeagleBone fails to boot when I change the am33xx_pinmux compatible
from "pinctrl,single" to "pinconf,single":
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
index 5ed7f3c58c0f..b5bedd776ee6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ scm: scm@0 {
ranges = <0 0 0x2000>;
am33xx_pinmux: pinmux@800 {
- compatible = "pinctrl-single";
+ compatible = "pinconf-single";
reg = <0x800 0x238>;
#pinctrl-cells = <1>;
pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
From the full dmesg output [0], these lines seem the most relevant:
[ 2.974958] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: 142 pins, size 568
[ 3.847475] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x160 value: 0x2f
[ 3.855556] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xfc value: 0x30
[ 3.863520] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf8 value: 0x30
[ 3.871483] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf4 value: 0x30
[ 3.879444] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf0 value: 0x30
[ 3.887404] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x104 value: 0x30
[ 3.895455] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x100 value: 0x30
[ 3.903505] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x1a0 value: 0x2c
[ 3.911583] pinctrl core: add 2 pinctrl maps
[ 3.915976] pinctrl core: failed to register map default (1): invalid type given
[ 3.923594] omap_hsmmc: probe of 48060000.mmc failed with error -22
[ 3.930403] omap_hsmmc 47810000.mmc: GPIO lookup for consumer cd
[ 4.440389] Waiting for root device /dev/mmcblk0p1...
The error message:
"pinctrl core: failed to register map default (1): invalid type given"
comes from drivers/pinctrl/core.c:
1387 int pinctrl_register_mappings(const struct pinctrl_map *maps,
1388 unsigned num_maps)
1389 {
1390 int i, ret;
1391 struct pinctrl_maps *maps_node;
1392
1393 pr_debug("add %u pinctrl maps\n", num_maps);
1394
1395 /* First sanity check the new mapping */
1396 for (i = 0; i < num_maps; i++) {
<snip>
1416 switch (maps[i].type) {
1417 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_DUMMY_STATE:
1418 break;
1419 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
1420 ret = pinmux_validate_map(&maps[i], i);
1421 if (ret < 0)
1422 return ret;
1423 break;
1424 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
1425 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
1426 ret = pinconf_validate_map(&maps[i], i);
1427 if (ret < 0)
1428 return ret;
1429 break;
1430 default:
1431 pr_err("failed to register map %s (%d): invalid type given\n",
1432 maps[i].name, i);
1433 return -EINVAL;
1434 }
1435 }
The invalid type error occurs when maps[i].type does not match any of
the case statements.
I have determined the system will boot ok [1] when num_maps is forced
to be 1. Here are the related dmesg lines:
[ 3.920484] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x160 value: 0x2f
[ 3.928420] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xfc value: 0x30
[ 3.936224] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf8 value: 0x30
[ 3.944026] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf4 value: 0x30
[ 3.951826] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0xf0 value: 0x30
[ 3.959627] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x104 value: 0x30
[ 3.967515] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x100 value: 0x30
[ 3.975403] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: pinmux-mmc0-pins index: 0x1a0 value: 0x2c
[ 3.983318] pinctrl core: add 1 pinctrl maps
[ 3.987653] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: found group selector 4 for pinmux-mmc0-pins
[ 3.995723] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 88 (PIN88) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.003434] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 63 (PIN63) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.011141] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 62 (PIN62) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.018847] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 61 (PIN61) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.026633] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 60 (PIN60) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.034351] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 65 (PIN65) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.042065] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 64 (PIN64) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.049774] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: request pin 104 (PIN104) for 48060000.mmc
[ 4.057662] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: enabling (null) function4
Here is the patch for num_maps:
diiff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 1e0614daee9b..78a93336c711 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
if (res)
goto free_pingroups;
- *num_maps = 2;
+ *num_maps = 1;
} else {
*num_maps = 1;
}
I am trying to understand why num_maps is supposed to be 2 when
PCS_HAS_PINCONF, and I would appreciate any comments.
Is there a bug somewhere in the code?
Or, is it supposed to be invalid to enable "pinconf,single" compatible
for the am33xx_pinmux node?
thank you,
drew
[0] https://gist.github.com/pdp7/293716fe98d90f031bb75950803952a1
[1] https://gist.github.com/pdp7/fc5186f46e34c3acc1b1a169be85d3a9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 12:21 pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support? Drew Fustini
2020-05-27 16:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-27 22:19 ` Drew Fustini
2020-05-27 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-28 12:53 ` Drew Fustini
2020-05-29 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-08 18:05 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-08 20:22 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-09 18:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-09 17:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-29 17:55 ` Drew Fustini [this message]
2020-05-31 0:17 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-08 12:09 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-08 12:40 ` Drew Fustini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529175544.GA3766151@x1 \
--to=drew@beagleboard.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.