All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: anna.schumaker@netapp.com, trondmy@hammerspace.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] NFS: Fix direct WRITE throughput regression
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:14:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529181440.2510.45116.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> (raw)

I measured a 50% throughput regression for large direct writes.

The observed on-the-wire behavior is that the client sends every
NFS WRITE twice: once as an UNSTABLE WRITE plus a COMMIT, and once
as a FILE_SYNC WRITE.

This is because the nfs_write_match_verf() check in
nfs_direct_commit_complete() fails for every WRITE.

Buffered writes use nfs_write_completion(), which sets req->wb_verf
correctly. Direct writes use nfs_direct_write_completion(), which
does not set req->wb_verf at all. This leaves req->wb_verf set to
all zeroes for every direct WRITE, and thus
nfs_direct_commit_completion() always sets NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES.

This fix appears to restore nearly all of the lost performance.

Fixes: 1f28476dcb98 ("NFS: Fix O_DIRECT commit verifier handling")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index a57e7c72c7f4..d49b1d197908 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ static void nfs_direct_write_completion(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
 		nfs_list_remove_request(req);
 		if (request_commit) {
 			kref_get(&req->wb_kref);
+			memcpy(&req->wb_verf, &hdr->verf.verifier,
+			       sizeof(req->wb_verf));
 			nfs_mark_request_commit(req, hdr->lseg, &cinfo,
 				hdr->ds_commit_idx);
 		}


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-29 18:14 Chuck Lever [this message]
2020-05-29 21:26 ` [PATCH v1] NFS: Fix direct WRITE throughput regression Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200529181440.2510.45116.stgit@manet.1015granger.net \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.