From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0404159564366055015==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'. Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 00:44:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20200530214428.GS22511@kadam> In-Reply-To: <5e1172d332f55803039114c4bb9a93361bcbc29a.camel@kernel.org> List-Id: To: kbuild@lists.01.org --===============0404159564366055015== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get > picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I > still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of > waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something? It doesn't take time from me. You can ignore the Reported-by tags for new devel work, no one will be offended. There is a way to disable it but I forget how. It should probably be added to the FAQ. https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service regards, dan carpenter --===============0404159564366055015==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4404297366178328002==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan Carpenter To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [kbuild] [jlayton:ceph-fscache-iter 76/77] fs/ceph/addr.c:225 ceph_fsreq_issue_op() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'. Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 00:44:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20200530214428.GS22511@kadam> In-Reply-To: <5e1172d332f55803039114c4bb9a93361bcbc29a.camel@kernel.org> List-Id: --===============4404297366178328002== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 04:49:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > I wonder -- is there a way to name my branches so that they don't get > picked up by the 0-day service? I generally like the testing, but when I > still have a branch that's not yet fully baked it's probably a bit of > waste. Maybe if we could prefix it with "wip-" or something? It doesn't take time from me. You can ignore the Reported-by tags for new devel work, no one will be offended. There is a way to disable it but I forget how. It should probably be added to the FAQ. https://01.org/lkp/documentation/0-day-test-service regards, dan carpenter --===============4404297366178328002==--