From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: "Wangshaobo (bobo)" <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com,
cj.chengjian@huawei.com, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, devel@etsukata.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
esyr@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Question: livepatch failed for new fork() task stack unreliable
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:14:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200602131450.oydrydelpdaval4h@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5e0f476-02b5-cc44-8d4e-d33ff2138143@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:22:30AM +0800, Wangshaobo (bobo) wrote:
> so i think this question is related to ORC unwinder, could i ask if you have
> strategy or plan to avoid this problem ?
I suspect something like this would fix it (untested):
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 6ad43fc44556..8cf95ded1410 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
if (regs) {
/* Success path for user tasks */
if (user_mode(regs))
- return 0;
+ break;
/*
* Kernel mode registers on the stack indicate an
@@ -81,10 +81,6 @@ int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
if (unwind_error(&state))
return -EINVAL;
- /* Success path for non-user tasks, i.e. kthreads and idle tasks */
- if (!(task->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IDLE)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
index 7f969b2d240f..d7396431261a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
state->sp = sp;
state->regs = NULL;
state->prev_regs = NULL;
- state->signal = false;
+ state->signal = ((void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork);
break;
case ORC_TYPE_REGS:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-02 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 10:10 Question: livepatch failed for new fork() task stack unreliable Wang ShaoBo
2020-05-29 17:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
[not found] ` <a9ed9157-f3cf-7d2c-7a8e-56150a2a114e@huawei.com>
2020-06-01 18:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-02 1:22 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2020-06-02 13:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-06-03 14:06 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2020-06-03 15:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-04 1:24 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2020-06-04 2:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-05 1:26 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2020-06-05 1:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-30 13:04 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2020-06-30 21:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200602131450.oydrydelpdaval4h@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=cj.chengjian@huawei.com \
--cc=devel@etsukata.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.