From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: daniel.thompson@linaro.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
jason.wessel@windriver.com, dianders@chromium.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jslaby@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] kdb: Switch to use safer dbg_io_ops over console APIs
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:25:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603082503.GD14855@linux-b0ei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591168935-6382-5-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
On Wed 2020-06-03 12:52:15, Sumit Garg wrote:
> In kgdb context, calling console handlers aren't safe due to locks used
> in those handlers which could in turn lead to a deadlock. Although, using
> oops_in_progress increases the chance to bypass locks in most console
> handlers but it might not be sufficient enough in case a console uses
> more locks (VT/TTY is good example).
>
> Currently when a driver provides both polling I/O and a console then kdb
> will output using the console. We can increase robustness by using the
> currently active polling I/O driver (which should be lockless) instead
> of the corresponding console. For several common cases (e.g. an
> embedded system with a single serial port that is used both for console
> output and debugger I/O) this will result in no console handler being
> used.
>
> In order to achieve this we need to reverse the order of preference to
> use dbg_io_ops (uses polling I/O mode) over console APIs. So we just
> store "struct console" that represents debugger I/O in dbg_io_ops and
> while emitting kdb messages, skip console that matches dbg_io_ops
> console in order to avoid duplicate messages. After this change,
> "is_console" param becomes redundant and hence removed.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> index 4139698..6e182aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> @@ -558,6 +557,7 @@ static int __init kgdboc_earlycon_init(char *opt)
> }
>
> earlycon = con;
> + kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops.cons = con;
> pr_info("Going to register kgdb with earlycon '%s'\n", con->name);
> if (kgdb_register_io_module(&kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops) != 0) {
> earlycon = NULL;
Should we clear kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops.cons here when
kgdb_register_io_module() failed?
> diff --git a/include/linux/kgdb.h b/include/linux/kgdb.h
> index c62d764..529116b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kgdb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kgdb.h
> @@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ struct kgdb_arch {
> * the I/O driver.
> * @post_exception: Pointer to a function that will do any cleanup work
> * for the I/O driver.
> - * @is_console: 1 if the end device is a console 0 if the I/O device is
> - * not a console
> + * @cons: valid if the I/O device is a console; else NULL.
> */
> struct kgdb_io {
> const char *name;
> @@ -288,7 +287,7 @@ struct kgdb_io {
> void (*deinit) (void);
> void (*pre_exception) (void);
> void (*post_exception) (void);
> - int is_console;
> + struct console *cons;
Nit: I would call it "con". The trailing 's' makes me feel that that the
variable points to an array or list of consoles.
> };
>
Otherwise, it looks pretty straightforward.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-03 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 7:22 [PATCH v5 0/4] kdb: Improve console handling Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] kdb: Re-factor kdb_printf() message write code Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 8:07 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] kdb: Check status of console prior to invoking handlers Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 8:08 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] kdb: Make kdb_printf() console handling more robust Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 8:10 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] kdb: Switch to use safer dbg_io_ops over console APIs Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 8:25 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-06-03 9:18 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-03 11:59 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03 9:32 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 11:42 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-03 13:05 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200603082503.GD14855@linux-b0ei \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.