All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] serial: core: make static analyzer happy about locks
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:08:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200612170811.GU37466@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200602144739.85566-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> [691231 23:00]:
> Static analyzer can not see balanced locking if the lock is acquired and
> released conditionally.
> 
>  context imbalance in 'uart_stop' - unexpected unlock
>  context imbalance in 'uart_start' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_port_startup' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_shutdown' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_put_char' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_write' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_write_room' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_chars_in_buffer' - different lock contexts for basic block
>  context imbalance in 'uart_flush_buffer' - different lock contexts for basic block
> 
> Get rid of macros and implement their functionality in place. This will also
> help to enable runtime PM in cleaner way later on.

Nice, yeah this is needed to make PM runtime handling generic for serial_core.c.
Patch works for me for my PM tests:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-12 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-02 14:47 [PATCH v1] serial: core: make static analyzer happy about locks Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-12 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2020-06-27 11:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200612170811.GU37466@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.