From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ? Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20200614220101.GA9367@salvia> References: <9feded75-4b45-2821-287b-af00ec5f910f@al2klimov.de> <174102.1592165965@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:33352 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727918AbgFNWBF (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:01:05 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB525FF90D for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6FFDA86E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: David Howells , "Alexander A. Klimov" , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Alan Stern , Andrea Parri , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E. McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:08:08PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sunday 2020-06-14 22:19, David Howells wrote: > >Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > > > >> *Is it a good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ?* > > > >Very likely not. If programs out there are going to be built on a > >case-sensitive filesystem (which happens all the time), they're going to break > >if you rename the headers. We're kind of stuck with them. > > Netfilter has precedent for removing old headers, e.g. > 7200135bc1e61f1437dc326ae2ef2f310c50b4eb's ipt_ULOG.h. That's only because NFLOG has been there for ~10 years, so it was safe to remove ULOG support. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:33352 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727918AbgFNWBF (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:01:05 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB525FF90D for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6FFDA86E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:01:01 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ? Message-ID: <20200614220101.GA9367@salvia> References: <9feded75-4b45-2821-287b-af00ec5f910f@al2klimov.de> <174102.1592165965@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: David Howells , "Alexander A. Klimov" , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Alan Stern , Andrea Parri , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E. McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20200614220101.6HH5oBLquIl8bWW18vBfklt_gYyYJm2QAhz8OZaCN_c@z> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:08:08PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Sunday 2020-06-14 22:19, David Howells wrote: > >Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > > > >> *Is it a good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ?* > > > >Very likely not. If programs out there are going to be built on a > >case-sensitive filesystem (which happens all the time), they're going to break > >if you rename the headers. We're kind of stuck with them. > > Netfilter has precedent for removing old headers, e.g. > 7200135bc1e61f1437dc326ae2ef2f310c50b4eb's ipt_ULOG.h. That's only because NFLOG has been there for ~10 years, so it was safe to remove ULOG support.