From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP flag
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:01:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618000110.GF2005@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617175310.20912-2-longman@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:53:09PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> There are cases where calling kmalloc() can lead to false positive
> lockdep splat. One notable example that can happen in the freezing of
> the xfs filesystem is as follows:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(sb_internal);
> lock(fs_reclaim);
> lock(sb_internal);
> lock(fs_reclaim);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> This is a false positive as all the dirty pages are flushed out before
> the filesystem can be frozen. However, there is no easy way to modify
> lockdep to handle this situation properly.
>
> One possible workaround is to disable lockdep by setting __GFP_NOLOCKDEP
> in the appropriate kmalloc() calls. However, it will be cumbersome to
> locate all the right kmalloc() calls to insert __GFP_NOLOCKDEP and it
> is easy to miss some especially when the code is updated in the future.
>
> Another alternative is to have a per-process global state that indicates
> the equivalent of __GFP_NOLOCKDEP without the need to set the gfp_t flag
> individually. To allow the latter case, a new PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP
> per-process flag is now added. After adding this new bit, there are
> still 2 free bits left.
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/sched/mm.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index b62e6aaf28f0..44247cbc9073 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1508,6 +1508,7 @@ extern struct pid *cad_pid;
> #define PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO 0x00080000 /* All allocation requests will inherit GFP_NOIO */
> #define PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE 0x00100000 /* Throttle writes only against the bdi I write to,
> * I am cleaning dirty pages from some other bdi. */
> +#define __PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP 0x00100000 /* All allocation requests will inherit __GFP_NOLOCKDEP */
Why is this considered a safe thing to do? Any context that sets
__PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP will now behave differently in memory
reclaim as it will think that PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE is set when lockdep
is enabled.
> #define PF_KTHREAD 0x00200000 /* I am a kernel thread */
> #define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00400000 /* Randomize virtual address space */
> #define PF_SWAPWRITE 0x00800000 /* Allowed to write to swap */
> @@ -1519,6 +1520,12 @@ extern struct pid *cad_pid;
> #define PF_FREEZER_SKIP 0x40000000 /* Freezer should not count it as freezable */
> #define PF_SUSPEND_TASK 0x80000000 /* This thread called freeze_processes() and should not be frozen */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP __PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP
> +#else
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP 0
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Only the _current_ task can read/write to tsk->flags, but other
> * tasks can access tsk->flags in readonly mode for example
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index 480a4d1b7dd8..4a076a148568 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -177,22 +177,27 @@ static inline bool in_vfork(struct task_struct *tsk)
> * Applies per-task gfp context to the given allocation flags.
> * PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO implies GFP_NOIO
> * PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS implies GFP_NOFS
> + * PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP implies __GFP_NOLOCKDEP
> * PF_MEMALLOC_NOCMA implies no allocation from CMA region.
> */
> static inline gfp_t current_gfp_context(gfp_t flags)
> {
> - if (unlikely(current->flags &
> - (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS | PF_MEMALLOC_NOCMA))) {
> + unsigned int pflags = current->flags;
> +
> + if (unlikely(pflags & (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS |
> + PF_MEMALLOC_NOCMA | PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP))) {
That needs a PF_MEMALLOC_MASK.
And, really, if we are playing "re-use existing bits" games because
we've run out of process flags, all these memalloc flags should be
moved to a new field in the task, say current->memalloc_flags. You
could also move PF_SWAPWRITE, PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE, and PF_KSWAPD into
that field as well as they are all memory allocation context process
flags...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 17:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched, xfs: Add PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP to fix lockdep problem in xfs Waiman Long
2020-06-17 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add PF_MEMALLOC_NOLOCKDEP flag Waiman Long
2020-06-18 0:01 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-06-18 1:32 ` Waiman Long
2020-06-22 19:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with sb_internal & fs_reclaim Waiman Long
2020-06-18 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2020-06-18 1:35 ` Waiman Long
2020-06-18 1:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-19 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-19 15:08 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618000110.GF2005@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.