From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: JeongHyeon Lee <jhs2.lee@samsung.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: New mode DM-Verity error handling
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:09:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618170952.GA18057@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618165006.GA103290@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 18 2020 at 12:50pm -0400,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:44:45AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I do not accept that panicing the system because of verity failure is
> > reasonable.
> >
> > In fact, even rebooting (via DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) looks very wrong.
> >
> > The device should be put in a failed state and left for admin recovery.
>
> That's exactly how the restart mode works on some Android devices. The
> bootloader sees the verification error and puts the device in recovery
> mode. Using the restart mode on systems without firmware support won't
> make sense, obviously.
OK, so I need further justification from Samsung why they are asking for
this panic mode.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200618070250epcas1p409eb2ddd19ecc5d55c219ac3dc884f25@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2020-06-18 6:56 ` [patch] New mode DM-Verity error handling JeongHyeon Lee
2020-06-18 15:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-18 16:50 ` [dm-devel] " Sami Tolvanen
2020-06-18 17:09 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-06-22 0:27 ` JeongHyeon Lee
2020-06-22 7:58 ` Milan Broz
2020-06-22 23:53 ` JeongHyeon Lee
2020-06-23 7:28 ` Milan Broz
2020-06-23 8:08 ` JeongHyeon Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618170952.GA18057@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jhs2.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.