From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:30:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20200623113007.GH31822@suse.de> References: <20200425191032.GK21900@8bytes.org> <910AE5B4-4522-4133-99F7-64850181FBF9@amacapital.net> <20200425202316.GL21900@8bytes.org> <20200428075512.GP30814@suse.de> <20200623110706.GB4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200623110706.GB4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Dave Hansen , Tom Lendacky , Mike Stunes , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Juergen Gross , Jiri Slaby , Kees Cook , kvm list , LKML , Thomas Hellstrom , Linux Virtualization , X86 ML , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Cooper List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 01:07:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:55:12AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > So what happens if this #VC triggers on the first access to the #VC > stack, because the malicious host has craftily mucked with only the #VC > IST stack page? > > Or on the NMI IST stack, then we get #VC in NMI before the NMI can fix > you up. > > AFAICT all of that is non-recoverable. I am not 100% sure, but I think if the #VC stack page is not validated, the #VC should be promoted to a #DF. Note that this is an issue only with secure nested paging (SNP), which is not enabled yet with this patch-set. When it gets enabled a stack recursion check in the #VC handler is needed which panics the VM. That also fixes the #VC-in-early-NMI problem. Regards, Joerg