From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20200623145914.GF14101@suse.de> References: <20200428075512.GP30814@suse.de> <20200623110706.GB4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200623113007.GH31822@suse.de> <20200623114818.GD4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200623120433.GB14101@suse.de> <20200623125201.GG4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200623134003.GD14101@suse.de> <20200623135916.GI4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200623145344.GA117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200623145344.GA117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Dave Hansen , Tom Lendacky , Mike Stunes , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Juergen Gross , Jiri Slaby , Kees Cook , kvm list , LKML , Thomas Hellstrom , Linux Virtualization , X86 ML , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Cooper List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > +noinstr void idtentry_validate_ist(struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + if ((regs->sp & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)) == > + (_RET_IP_ & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1))) > + die("IST stack recursion", regs, 0); > +} Yes, this is a start, it doesn't cover the case where the NMI stack is in-between, so I think you need to walk down regs->sp too. The dumpstack code already has some logic for this. Joerg