From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait_on_page_bit_common(TASK_KILLABLE, EXCLUSIVE) can miss wakeup?
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:20:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624162042.GA12238@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624161142.GA12184@redhat.com>
On 06/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Suppose that 2 threads T1 and T2 call __lock_page_killable() and sleep in
> wait_on_page_bit_common() -> io_schedule().
>
> T1 is killed, it does test_and_set_bit_lock() but the page is still locked.
>
> unlock_page() calls __wake_up_common(nr_exclusive = 1), this wakes T1 up.
> T2 is not woken.
Ah, please ignore me, sorry for noise.
If T1 is killed it is TASK_RUNNING, try_to_wake_up() should return 0.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 16:11 wait_on_page_bit_common(TASK_KILLABLE, EXCLUSIVE) can miss wakeup? Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-24 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2020-06-24 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-26 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-28 5:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-28 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-29 3:28 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-29 13:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-29 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-30 2:12 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-29 14:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 2:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30 6:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 9:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30 10:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 11:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 11:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-30 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-30 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-29 15:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-24 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-24 16:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624162042.GA12238@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.