All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] fs: add new read_uptr and write_uptr file operations
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:55:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624175548.GA25939@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wit9enePELG=-HnLsr0nY5bucFNjqAqWoFTuYDGR1P4KA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:19:16AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Honestly, I think this is the wrong way to go.
> 
> All of this new complexity and messiness, just to remove a few
> unimportant final cases?
> 
> If somebody can't be bothered to convert a driver to
> iter_read/iter_write, why would they be bothered to convert it to
> read_uptr/write_uptr?
> 
> And this messiness will stay around for decades.
> 
> So let's not go down that path.
> 
> If you want to do "splice() and kernel_read() requires read_iter"
> (with a warning so that we find any cases), then that's fine. But
> let's not add yet _another_ read type.
> 
> Why did you care so much about sysctl, and why couldn't they use the iter ops?

I don't care at all.  Based on our previous chat I assumed you
wanted something like this.  We might still need the uptr_t for
setsockopt, though.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-24 16:28 [RFC] stop using ->read and ->write for kernel access Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] uptr: add a new "universal pointer" type Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs: factor out a set_fmode_can_read_write helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] fs: add new read_uptr and write_uptr file operations Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 17:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-24 17:55     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-06-24 18:11       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-24 18:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 18:20           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-24 18:24             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 18:29               ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-24 18:31                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 18:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-27 10:49         ` David Laight
2020-06-27 16:33           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-29  8:21             ` David Laight
2020-06-29 15:29             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29 17:02               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-29 18:07                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29 18:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-29 18:36                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29 19:10                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-30  7:04                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-30  7:51                 ` David Laight
2020-07-08  5:14             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:56     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-24 17:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 18:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 18:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] sysctl: switch to ->{read,write}_uptr Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] fs: refactor new_sync_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] seq_file: add seq_read_iter Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] seq_file: switch over direct seq_read method calls to seq_read_iter Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] proc: " Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:29 ` [PATCH 10/11] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes using ->read and ->write Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 16:29 ` [PATCH 11/11] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200624175548.GA25939@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.