From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, zeil@yandex-team.ru,
tony.luck@intel.com, osalvador@suse.de, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
mhocko@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
naoya.horiguchi@nec.com
Subject: + mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:19:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624191926.Ob2AB%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm,madvise: call soft_offline_page() without MF_COUNT_INCREASED
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Subject: mm,madvise: call soft_offline_page() without MF_COUNT_INCREASED
The call to get_user_pages_fast is only to get the pointer to a struct
page of a given address, pinning it is memory-poisoning handler's job, so
drop the refcount grabbed by get_user_pages_fast().
Note that the target page is still pinned after this put_page() because
the current process should have refcount from mapping.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200624150137.7052-4-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/madvise.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/madvise.c~mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased
+++ a/mm/madvise.c
@@ -893,16 +893,24 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int beha
*/
size = page_size(compound_head(page));
- if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
- put_page(page);
+ /*
+ * The get_user_pages_fast() is just to get the pfn of the
+ * given address, and the refcount has nothing to do with
+ * what we try to test, so it should be released immediately.
+ * This is racy but it's intended because the real hardware
+ * errors could happen at any moment and memory error handlers
+ * must properly handle the race.
+ */
+ put_page(page);
+
+ if (PageHWPoison(page))
continue;
- }
if (behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) {
pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
pfn, start);
- ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
+ ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, 0);
if (ret)
return ret;
continue;
@@ -910,14 +918,6 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int beha
pr_info("Injecting memory failure for pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
pfn, start);
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 19:19 akpm [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-03 22:14 incoming Andrew Morton
2020-07-16 21:45 ` + mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
2020-07-24 4:14 incoming Andrew Morton
2020-07-31 20:05 ` + mmmadvise-call-soft_offline_page-without-mf_count_increased.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
2020-11-20 23:58 akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624191926.Ob2AB%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=zeil@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.