From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Marc Hartmayer" <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Enable virtio-fs on s390x
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625141329.6ca84e39.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625121755.24940841.cohuck@redhat.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:17:55 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:04:26 +0200
> Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This RFC is about enabling virtio-fs on s390x. For that we need
> > + some shim code (first patch), and we need
> > + libvhost-user to deal with virtio endiannes as mandated by the spec.
> >
> > The second part is trickier, because unlike QEMU we are not certain
> > about the guest's native endianness, which is needed to handle the
> > legacy-interface appropriately. In fact, this is the reason why just
> > RFC.
> >
> > One of the open questions is whether to build separate versions, one
> > for guest little endian and one for guest big endian, or do we want
> > something like a command line option? (Digression on the libvirt
> > modeling)
> >
> > A third option would be to refuse legacy altogether.
>
> The third option looks the most tempting to me. It is a new device, so
> I don't think there's much of a case to be made for pre-virtio-1
> support?
>
>
Yes, virtio-fs is a new device, but libvhost-user is not specific to
virtio-fs.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-25 10:04 [RFC 0/4] Enable virtio-fs on s390x Marc Hartmayer
2020-06-25 10:04 ` [RFC 1/4] virtio: add vhost-user-fs-ccw device Marc Hartmayer
2020-06-25 10:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-25 10:04 ` [RFC 2/4] libvhost-user: print invalid address on vu_panic Marc Hartmayer
2020-06-25 10:04 ` [RFC 3/4] libvhost-user: handle endianness as mandated by the spec Marc Hartmayer
2020-06-25 10:04 ` [RFC 4/4] HACK: Hard-code the libvhost-user.o-cflags for s390x Marc Hartmayer
2020-06-25 10:13 ` [RFC 0/4] Enable virtio-fs on s390x no-reply
2020-06-25 10:16 ` no-reply
2020-06-25 10:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-25 12:13 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2020-06-25 10:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 10:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-25 10:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 10:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-25 11:07 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-06-25 12:21 ` Halil Pasic
2020-06-29 12:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-29 13:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-30 9:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 9:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-02 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200625141329.6ca84e39.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.