From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD09C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB91020672 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:03:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB91020672 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC396E2DD; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ACFB6E2DD for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:03:07 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: BkRXrUIsRuUzGD5vqJJVIXbG54pqltSPVWGqxSBRuU3g7MCEQljFBh7wpII0o/rQnmHXvkoviK /OhIUFtPJEug== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9663"; a="132533517" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,280,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="132533517" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jun 2020 15:03:06 -0700 IronPort-SDR: NFOAO1tEJoEhh8qaqqcETw/p8mYJjAMrETOVvyQRA4VBu2nLViWDJgG9/lQYaCogmd1dJqV8XB czS1esIjQwaQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,280,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="294023279" Received: from labuser-z97x-ud5h.jf.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.165.21.211]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2020 15:03:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:04:33 -0700 From: Manasi Navare To: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Message-ID: <20200625220432.GC30431@intel.com> References: <20200624221108.10038-1-manasi.d.navare@intel.com> <20200624221108.10038-2-manasi.d.navare@intel.com> <20200625212853.GX6112@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200625212853.GX6112@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Helper to check for DDI BUF status to get active X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:28:53AM +0300, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:11:08PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > Based on the platform, Bspec expects us to wait or poll with > > timeout for DDI BUF IDLE bit to be set to 0 (non idle) or get active > > after enabling DDI_BUF_CTL. > > = > > v3: > > * Add a new function _active for DDI BUF CTL to be non idle (Ville) > > v2: > > * Based on platform, fixed delay or poll (Ville) > > * Use a helper to do this (Imre, Ville) > > = > > Cc: Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > > Cc: Imre Deak > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > = > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm= /i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > index 7d5c8ab88fc4..ff6b1e9d1b4e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c > > @@ -1195,6 +1195,20 @@ static void intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle(struct drm_i= 915_private *dev_priv, > > port_name(port)); > > } > > = > > +static void intel_wait_ddi_buf_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_pri= v, > > + enum port port) > > +{ > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <=3D 9) { > = > Didn't we want the poll approach for glk+? Actually in the bspec I only see Gen10+ has a 500usecs timeout Manasi > = > > + usleep_range(600, 1000); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (wait_for_us(!(intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port)) & > > + DDI_BUF_IS_IDLE), 600)) > > + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Timeout waiting for DDI BUF %c to get activ= e\n", > > + port_name(port)); > > +} > > + > > static u32 hsw_pll_to_ddi_pll_sel(const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll) > > { > > switch (pll->info->id) { > > @@ -4020,7 +4034,7 @@ static void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct= intel_dp *intel_dp) > > intel_de_write(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port), intel_dp->DP); > > intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port)); > > = > > - udelay(600); > > + intel_wait_ddi_buf_active(dev_priv, port); > = > Missed the FDI case. > = > Also we're still missing this for HDMI, on icl+ I think? Can't quite > remember if that was where the spec started to demand it. > = > > } > > = > > static void intel_ddi_set_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > > -- = > > 2.19.1 > = > -- = > Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx