Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter()

["SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:30:29PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> 
> The get_bloom_filter() method is a bit complicated in some parts where
> it does not need to be. In particular, it needs to return a NULL filter
> only when compute_if_not_present is zero AND the filter data cannot be
> loaded from a commit-graph file. This currently happens by accident
> because the commit-graph does not load changed-path Bloom filters from
> an existing commit-graph when writing a new one. This will change in a
> later patch.
> 
> Also clean up some style issues while we are here.
> 
> Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  bloom.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/bloom.c b/bloom.c
> index c38d1cff0c..2af5389795 100644
> --- a/bloom.c
> +++ b/bloom.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ struct bloom_filter *get_bloom_filter(struct repository *r,
>  	struct diff_options diffopt;
>  	int max_changes = 512;
>  
> -	if (bloom_filters.slab_size == 0)
> +	if (!bloom_filters.slab_size)
>  		return NULL;
>
>  	filter = bloom_filter_slab_at(&bloom_filters, c);
> @@ -194,16 +194,14 @@ struct bloom_filter *get_bloom_filter(struct repository *r,
>  	if (!filter->data) {
>  		load_commit_graph_info(r, c);
>  		if (c->graph_pos != COMMIT_NOT_FROM_GRAPH &&
> -			r->objects->commit_graph->chunk_bloom_indexes) {
> -			if (load_bloom_filter_from_graph(r->objects->commit_graph, filter, c))
> -				return filter;
> -			else
> -				return NULL;
> -		}
> +		    r->objects->commit_graph->chunk_bloom_indexes)
> +			load_bloom_filter_from_graph(r->objects->commit_graph, filter, c);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (filter->data || !compute_if_not_present)
> +	if (filter->data)
>  		return filter;
> +	if (!compute_if_not_present)
> +		return NULL;

Some callers of get_bloom_filter() invoke it with
compute_if_not_present=0, but are not prepared to handle a NULL return
value and dereference it right away:

  write_graph_chunk_bloom_indexes():

                struct bloom_filter *filter = get_bloom_filter(ctx->r, *list, 0);
                cur_pos += filter->len;

  write_graph_chunk_bloom_data():

                struct bloom_filter *filter = get_bloom_filter(ctx->r, *list, 0);
                display_progress(progress, ++i);
                hashwrite(f, filter->data, filter->len * sizeof(unsigned char));

I don't know whether this was an issue before, but I didn't really
tried.  Unfortunately, starting with this patch this causes
segmentation faults basically in all real repositories I use for
testing.

  expecting success of 9999.1 'test': 
          for i in $(test_seq 1 513)
          do
                  >file-$i || return 1
          done &&
          git add file-* &&
          git commit -q -m one &&
  
          git commit-graph write --reachable --changed-paths
  
  Segmentation fault
  not ok 1 - test


  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x0000000000515848 in write_graph_chunk_bloom_indexes (f=0x9fe650, 
      ctx=0x9d2000) at commit-graph.c:1101
  1101                    cur_pos += filter->len;
  (gdb) print filter
  $1 = (struct bloom_filter *) 0x0



>  	repo_diff_setup(r, &diffopt);
>  	diffopt.flags.recursive = 1;
> -- 
> gitgitgadget
>