From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:17:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630081730.6862-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
This is the follow-up of [1]:
[PATCH RFC 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
This series is based on the latest s390/features branch, which contains
"s390/zcore: remove memmap device". [2]
Looking into why we still create memblocks for stdnaby/hotplugged memory
(via add_memory()), I discovered that we might not need ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
on s390x after all.
This is relevant in the context of virtio-mem, where we hotplug a lot of
small memory blocks (and want to avoid managing unused metadata). But also
for existing setups, it might help to free up some memory after boot.
Compile-tested on s390x, pseries, arm64, i386, mips64, powernv, sh, and
x86_64.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200417150151.17239-1-david@redhat.com
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features
RFC -> v1:
- "s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks" has been replaced
on s390/features by "s390/zcore: remove memmap devic"
- Add "mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem"
-- Sort out section mismatch errors when using physmem after boot without
ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
- "s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK"
-- Rephrase description
David Hildenbrand (2):
mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 6 ++--
include/linux/memblock.h | 17 +++++++---
mm/memblock.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 8:17 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-06-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem David Hildenbrand
2020-06-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-30 16:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-30 16:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-30 17:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200630081730.6862-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prudo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.