From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Phu Luu <Phu.Luu@silabs.com>
Cc: "johan@kernel.org" <johan@kernel.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brant Merryman" <Brant.Merryman@silabs.com>,
"Richard Hendricks" <Richard.Hendricks@silabs.com>,
"Phú Lưu An" <luuanphu@gmail.com>,
"hungnd3@fsoft.com.vn" <hungnd3@fsoft.com.vn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] USB: serial: cp210x: Proper RTS control when buffers fill
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:18:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706101834.GI3453@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626074206.GP3334@localhost>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:42:06AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:24:20AM +0000, Phu Luu wrote:
> > From: Brant Merryman <brant.merryman@silabs.com>
> >
> > CP210x hardware disables auto-RTS but leaves auto-CTS when
> > in hardware flow control mode and UART on cp210x hardware
> > is disabled. This allows data to flow out, but new data
> > will not come into the port. When re-opening the port, if
> > auto-CTS is enabled on the cp210x, then auto-RTS must be
> > re-enabled in the driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phu Luu <phu.luu@silabs.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Brant Merryman <brant.merryman@silabs.com>
>
> Please revisit these tags as well.
>
> > ---
> > 06/09/2020: Patch v3 2/2 Modified based on feedback from Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > 12/18/2019: Patch v2 Broken into two patches and modified based on feedback from Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > 12/09/2019: Initial submission of patch "Proper RTS control when buffers fill"
> >
> > drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> > index bcceb4ad8be0..091441b1c5b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> > @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ static void cp210x_get_termios_port(struct usb_serial_port *port,
> > u32 baud;
> > u16 bits;
> > u32 ctl_hs;
> > + u32 flow_repl;
> >
> > cp210x_read_u32_reg(port, CP210X_GET_BAUDRATE, &baud);
> >
> > @@ -1017,6 +1018,23 @@ static void cp210x_get_termios_port(struct usb_serial_port *port,
> > ctl_hs = le32_to_cpu(flow_ctl.ulControlHandshake);
> > if (ctl_hs & CP210X_SERIAL_CTS_HANDSHAKE) {
> > dev_dbg(dev, "%s - flow control = CRTSCTS\n", __func__);
> > + /*
> > + * When the port is closed, the CP210x hardware disables
> > + * auto-RTS and RTS is deasserted but it leaves auto-CTS when
> > + * in hardware flow control mode. This prevents new data from
> > + * being received by the port. When re-opening the port, if
> > + * auto-CTS is enabled on the cp210x, then auto-RTS must be
> > + * re-enabled in the driver.
> > + */
>
> I already asked this of Brant, but could you please be more specific
> about which state the RTS-line end up in when disabling the UART (e.g.
> 0x00: statically inactive)?
>
> The reason I ask is that after open() returns, the tty layer would raise
> RTS, which should again allow data to flow in in contrast to what the
> comment and changelog text claims.
I had another reason to look at this driver so I could determine that
the patch description and comment were indeed incorrect; the tty layer
asserts RTS when reopening the port just fine and data flows in.
> We still want to enable auto-RTS of course so the patch is otherwise
> correct.
I've fixed up the commit message and comment, reordered the SOB tags
and added your Co-developed-by tag before applying both of these now:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/johan/usb-serial.git/log/?h=usb-next
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-06 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 4:24 [PATCH v3 2/2] USB: serial: cp210x: Proper RTS control when buffers fill Phu Luu
2020-06-26 7:42 ` Johan Hovold
2020-07-06 10:18 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
[not found] ` <CAP847ynZDozdA0kDEo6Zjuk0LOeaiTyW_fnU89hnFUD8ntL8uw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-17 9:55 ` Johan Hovold
[not found] <DM6PR11MB2857CC4B06D64F290FC42E739C950@DM6PR11MB2857.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-06-24 7:09 ` gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200706101834.GI3453@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=Brant.Merryman@silabs.com \
--cc=Phu.Luu@silabs.com \
--cc=Richard.Hendricks@silabs.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hungnd3@fsoft.com.vn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luuanphu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.