From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Restrict possible nodes based on platform
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:20:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200707025047.GA874@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00388e11-9025-e273-137d-c23f8795457a@linux.ibm.com>
* Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com> [2020-07-06 13:58:42]:
> On 7/5/20 11:40 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > index 9fcf2d195830..3d55cef1a2dc 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void)
> > return;
> >
> > if (of_property_read_u32_index(rtas,
> > - "ibm,max-associativity-domains",
> > + "ibm,current-associativity-domains",
>
> I'm not sure ibm,current-associativity-domains is guaranteed to exist on older
> firmware. You may need check that it exists and fall back to
> ibm,max-associativity-domains in the event it doesn't
>
> -Tyrel
>
Oh,
thanks Tyrel thats a good observation.
Will fallback on max-associativity.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-06 6:40 [PATCH] powerpc/numa: Restrict possible nodes based on platform Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-06 20:58 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2020-07-07 0:44 ` Nathan Lynch
2020-07-07 2:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-07 2:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2020-07-06 23:19 ` Nathan Lynch
2020-07-07 5:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-07 8:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-10 17:41 ` Nathan Lynch
2020-07-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/numa: Limit possible nodes to within num_possible_nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/numa: Remove a redundant variable Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-22 3:28 ` Nathan Lynch
2020-07-22 3:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/numa: Limit possible nodes to within num_possible_nodes Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200707025047.GA874@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.