From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ED5C433E0 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E40206E2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="QflD9fde"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="gJ7wmMYJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B6E40206E2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EF3165D; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:50:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 52EF3165D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1594216283; bh=50WfCJpofBL1SYdqpkVRPeMWrIfNI/ATizqCXd6zFsg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=QflD9fdep66Prp0DaCW4uI0py0vU90f8ePuaGNsdCUlkKi0fCjTFQV6ECBWIi8Sg5 uJz7J7moE6VgFHIiTXEjqGWNOLWkwtcPCTaFk3jzr72rI0ozCpMUKOQHGYAlIgCUuy to9BH8hddqVObJ+jUYogld84I912kbDfJrEPe0Js= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D92F8011F; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:50:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 8033EF80150; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:50:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E63EF800AE for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:50:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 0E63EF800AE Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="gJ7wmMYJ" Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id o11so49134503wrv.9 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=8lHrceqJXb/mkLYeI8FBGxk6DvEc2eMTSc2t0E7UjQQ=; b=gJ7wmMYJ5XLMLGo1oalgDqse6A0rlPdMgH2mtw/ZFPzattCsAWnXMIWzDT+12v5pV6 j2LAoN0ohozz9KWjS8+yZOKhzy/EItkjt0YNL6ZYba7KmpWFjtP2ef52IGWXmIhQo9ib k3QcjJxeAPj1TA+u0mgm6vsRVN7SsOjtXaL2oca+LhnYy664gc0hM83/zU/0CmuDhpdd fuBRho6lNPcMwSk9gZQ/csbK8IQFK94b4SclwuUS+zsPKryNEVYjnqe15AouDLIZEYjv DehNIFNrGmpmLuRtTEj24O4oTKeaj7BxMC41oIAxAnyoYqiTVTcfalaHIuMWR+Z1yVks JmDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=8lHrceqJXb/mkLYeI8FBGxk6DvEc2eMTSc2t0E7UjQQ=; b=jxOqJ76E024qU9T135fdurd8ymMjm4nt6XleAxe+Ga80eg+H7F53oPFlaw/oa+foSb uE/0t8tp8Ez70LbEpKvRhbVGOukMpibyCYI5oMxprzNnjm9Grf8NiLn51s2pXaJX6uTD qLz2lHx+lWrmhTfqSvjJ8W9Xn2P4SKSshueRyI1xECYVdz/sDbNHTINrfg/EoL9Wdh7T erbKKU6+2b9rTVOf6+Z2FU3cgbL/rIAV/14UdBaOJZ7gjR3oR6CRU+JY70JIRLE74cu/ dV/wW4qsLDDPs9/ecwMC8mQaK1AwFJx41XUXHiVMqrwCmyrfvcWA8zS6m5AolEU6CwOr mGQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300F6mvjBgKnzP61pjoKn9A0hj3UKLctxgDSIPzmn4ZNMDzMIZ/ LZmjB17qkEicmpk3wafp3jA9JQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSsrkmAU33M2XHIGGqqR0DTSPDfhqGY8G7leUqAS0g57m679UaChTXxr9XxRZK75OqRV5T9w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6987:: with SMTP id g7mr58130023wru.79.1594216219855; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([2.27.35.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm6274790wma.43.2020.07.08.06.50.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:50:16 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ASoC: =?utf-8?Q?Clean?= =?utf-8?Q?-up_W=3D1_build_warnings=E2=80=8B?= - part2 Message-ID: <20200708135016.GX3500@dell> References: <20200707191615.98296-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200708063900.GJ3500@dell> <93b7fb31-7a00-2c68-5096-6a3c81df881a@linux.intel.com> <20200708130606.GW3500@dell> <20200708133833.GQ4655@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200708133833.GQ4655@sirena.org.uk> Cc: tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Wed, 08 Jul 2020, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:06:06PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > > ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix kernel-doc > > > > > ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: fix kernel-doc > > > > > ASoC: codecs: rt5631: fix kernel-doc > > > > which tools? seems pretty bad to me to rely on string uniqueness, isn't > > > uniqueness defined by SHA1s? > > > SHAs don't work across rebases/cherry-picks. > > > Sometimes subject lines are the most reliable way to 'match'. > > Note that all these patches have unique subjects due to the prefixes > saying what they're modifying, this is a common pattern for these sorts > of repetitive serieses doing broad cleanups. Yes, they're unique within *this* set. The fun starts when you conduct another pass a few months/years down the line and have the same lack of imagination. :) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog