Re: [linux-stable-rc:queue/5.4 109/220] /tmp/filter-273424.s:50187: Error: bad expression

[Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1806 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:13:13AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:29 PM Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:01:12AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Looks like c4e5c229b610, should we ask stable to backport to 5.4?  I
> > > don't think we had clang builds working for 5.4 for s390, so maybe we
> > > should just Philip to disable Clang builds of this stable branch for
> > > s390? (There may not be too many backports to support, but I don't
> > Got it, we will disable s390 for the linux-stable-rc.
> 
> Yeah, it's hard for s390 and probably riscv support on stable as we
> only got those working on mainline recently.
got it, we will disable riscv for stable as well when kernel <= 5.4.

> 
> > BTW: does the bot need switch to use clang's as instead of gnu's?
> 
> No; in the process of whipping LLVM's binutils substitutes into shape,
> we're doing pretty well, except for clang's integrated assembler (IA).
> Ironically, right now we can only build risc-v with clang's IA.
> 
> I would recommend `make LLVM=1` for most cases, though `make CC=clang
> LD=ld.lld ...` may be all that we can get away with for testing stable
> tree's branches.
> 
> Will you, Rong, and the rest of the 0day bot team be attending Linux
> Plumbers Conference this year?  I would like to put together a session
> on "CI and Clang" with the kernelci folks and tuxbuild folks to go
> over our current compatibility table, which is a little complex ATM.
> If you're attending the conference, would you be interested in
> attending such a session?
thanks, this is not decided yet at our side, we will update this later.
Yes, if we have chance to attend, we are glad to join such session.

> -- 
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers