From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7404530646089436163==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Philip Li To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [linux-stable-rc:queue/5.4 109/220] /tmp/filter-273424.s:50187: Error: bad expression Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:26:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20200709002634.GB12731@intel.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============7404530646089436163== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:13:13AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:29 PM Philip Li wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:01:12AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > Looks like c4e5c229b610, should we ask stable to backport to 5.4? I > > > don't think we had clang builds working for 5.4 for s390, so maybe we > > > should just Philip to disable Clang builds of this stable branch for > > > s390? (There may not be too many backports to support, but I don't > > Got it, we will disable s390 for the linux-stable-rc. > = > Yeah, it's hard for s390 and probably riscv support on stable as we > only got those working on mainline recently. got it, we will disable riscv for stable as well when kernel <=3D 5.4. > = > > BTW: does the bot need switch to use clang's as instead of gnu's? > = > No; in the process of whipping LLVM's binutils substitutes into shape, > we're doing pretty well, except for clang's integrated assembler (IA). > Ironically, right now we can only build risc-v with clang's IA. > = > I would recommend `make LLVM=3D1` for most cases, though `make CC=3Dclang > LD=3Dld.lld ...` may be all that we can get away with for testing stable > tree's branches. > = > Will you, Rong, and the rest of the 0day bot team be attending Linux > Plumbers Conference this year? I would like to put together a session > on "CI and Clang" with the kernelci folks and tuxbuild folks to go > over our current compatibility table, which is a little complex ATM. > If you're attending the conference, would you be interested in > attending such a session? thanks, this is not decided yet at our side, we will update this later. Yes, if we have chance to attend, we are glad to join such session. > -- = > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers --===============7404530646089436163==--