From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: powerpc: Incorrect stw operand modifier in __set_pte_at
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 19:30:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709003041.GG3598@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <582c7ca7-a7a4-9861-cd53-8e34ff10c942@csgroup.eu>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:16:54PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 08/07/2020 à 16:45, Mathieu Desnoyers a écrit :
> >Reviewing use of the patterns "Un%Xn" with lwz and stw instructions
> >(where n should be the operand number) within the Linux kernel led
> >me to spot those 2 weird cases:
> >
> >arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h:__set_pte_at()
> >
> > __asm__ __volatile__("\
> > stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
> > eieio\n\
> > stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
> > : "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
> > : "r" (pte) : "memory");
> >
> >I would have expected the stw to be:
> >
> > stw%U1%X1 %L2,%1"
> >
> >and:
> >arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h:__set_pte_at()
> >
> > __asm__ __volatile__("\
> > stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
> > eieio\n\
> > stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
> > : "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
> > : "r" (pte) : "memory");
> >
> >where I would have expected:
> >
> > stw%U1%X1 %L2,%1"
> >
> >Is it a bug or am I missing something ?
>
> Well spotted. I guess it's definitly a bug.
Yes :-)
> Introduced 12 years ago by commit
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9bf2b5cd
> ("powerpc: Fixes for CONFIG_PTE_64BIT for SMP support").
>
> It's gone unnoticed until now it seems.
Apparently it always could use offset form memory accesses? Or even
when not, %0 and %1 are likely to use the same base register for
addressing :-)
Segher
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-09 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-08 14:45 powerpc: Incorrect stw operand modifier in __set_pte_at Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-08 16:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-09 0:30 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200709003041.GG3598@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.