Re: Failure to build librseq on ppc

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:42:56PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > That works fine then, for a testcase.  Using r17 is not a great idea for
> > performance (it increases the active register footprint, and causes more
> > registers to be saved in the prologue of the functions, esp. on older
> > compilers), and it is easier to just let the compiler choose a good
> > register to use.  But maybe you want to see r17 in the generated
> > testcases, as eyecatcher or something, dunno :-)
> 
> Just to make sure I understand your recommendation. So rather than
> hard coding r17 as the temporary registers, we could explicitly
> declare the temporary register as a C variable, pass it as an
> input operand to the inline asm, and then refer to it by operand
> name in the macros using it. This way the compiler would be free
> to perform its own register allocation.
> 
> If that is what you have in mind, then yes, I think it makes a
> lot of sense.

You write to it as well, so an inout register ("+r" or such).  And yes,
you use a local var for it (like "long tmp;").  And then you can refer
to it like anything else in your asm, like "%3" or like
"%[a_long_name]"; and the compiler sees it as any other register,
exactly.


Segher