From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31ECC433E0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4E42065F for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594339865; bh=zjtQl0zJdRLAoPslwauIn4hY5qrh4R5fGBwA/jfVB3Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Fhc7sr+Pno/P8D0joP8mfpTdoPVB9iqe2Y92TBwzBjb6tGZAUmfGayKkClVb+zG/p 6CpaSiCoTo8f5BntSo41TJxrPraixCV/i7aZPEFY+Y6Xj0Hrr7XBVDbSe9c2JMI5zn JK0aLYHuBxltxGJl8huHairxWbV3MzFnJi5iSkso= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726311AbgGJALF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:11:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55600 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726272AbgGJALF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:11:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (mobile-166-175-191-139.mycingular.net [166.175.191.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA3DD2065F; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594339864; bh=zjtQl0zJdRLAoPslwauIn4hY5qrh4R5fGBwA/jfVB3Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=i5Ht+NQkFU6WDbFOgD27hnMeIlHHDypgYQfNgtwIMhzX4nFu5e+cC4LAhzpZvcgqw tRvFvNsExcRCG1BZwc+ilVRRcnJct5krKpehbyS2jo9E+HjljqUXpevmkL+Us6sMeo X3vLlhpQu3sZLXuKtjyht+WP7cAC5QFVi9eQ5kk8= Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 19:11:02 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 RFC] PCI: Remove "*val = 0" from pcie_capability_read_*() Message-ID: <20200710001102.GA29833@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org The cc list is really screwed up. Here's what I got: Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed , bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell Currey , Sam Bobroff , "Oliver O'Halloran" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Lukas Wunner , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mike Marciniszyn , Dennis Dalessandro , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , "Greg Kroah-Hartman linux-rdma @ vger . kernel . org" The addresses for Len Brown and Lukas Wunner are corrupted, as is Greg KH's. And my reply-all didn't work -- it *should* have copied this to everybody in the list, but Mutt apparently couldn't interpret the cc list at all, so it left the cc list of my reply empty. I added linux-pci by hand just so this will show up on the list. On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:31:10AM +0200, Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa wrote: > From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed > > *** BLURB HERE *** This series isn't structured quite right. You should replace the "BLURB HERE" above with an actual description of the series. > Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed (9): > IB/hfi1: Confirm that pcie_capability_read_dword() is successful > misc: rtsx: Confirm that pcie_capability_read_word() is successful > PCI/AER: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI/ASPM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI: pciehp: Fix wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI: pciehp: Prevent wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default in pciehp_get_power_status() > PCI/ACPI: Prevent wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI: Prevent wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*() > PCI: Remove "*val = 0" fom pcie_capability_read_*() And the subject claims 11 patches ("PATCH 0/11"), the header above claims 9, the list actually contains 10, and only 8 seem to have made it to the mailing list: $ b4 am -om/ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself%40gmail.com Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees Analyzing 9 messages in the thread --- Thread incomplete, attempting to backfill Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/lkml Server returned an error: 404 Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi Server returned an error: 404 Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-pci Server returned an error: 404 Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma Server returned an error: 404 --- Writing m/20200706_refactormyself_pci_remove_val_0_from_pcie_capability_read.mbx ERROR: missing [1/11]! [PATCH 2/11 RFC] misc: rtsx: Confirm that pcie_capability_read_word() is successful [PATCH 3/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() [PATCH 4/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() [PATCH 5/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default ERROR: missing [6/11]! [PATCH 7/11 RFC] PCI: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() [PATCH 8/11 RFC] PCI/PM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() ERROR: missing [9/11]! [PATCH 10/11 RFC] PCI/ASPM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() [PATCH 11/11 RFC] PCI: Remove "*val = 0" from pcie_capability_read_*() --- Total patches: 8 --- WARNING: Thread incomplete!