From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [vincent.guittot:sched/pelt 1/2] kernel/sched/fair.c:4056:25: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (task_h_load(p)) (aka 'unsigned long and 'typeof (1) (aka 'int
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:09:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202007101820.LWRXMbQL%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10988 bytes --]
tree: https://git.linaro.org/people/vincent.guittot/kernel.git sched/pelt
head: cc807c0b8d03785da906a6a8436be5838bfe9d54
commit: a057128bc3087ebc9505454a1b5d7a4ae35c6e04 [1/2] sched/fair: handle case of task_h_load() returning 0
config: s390-randconfig-r031-20200710 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 02946de3802d3bc65bc9f2eb9b8d4969b5a7add8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
git checkout a057128bc3087ebc9505454a1b5d7a4ae35c6e04
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:20:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x0000ff00UL) << 8) | \
^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >> 8) | \
^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:45: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
__fswab32(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:21:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:72:
include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:511:46: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew(cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:521:46: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel(cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:4056:25: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (task_h_load(p)) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') and 'typeof (1) *' (aka 'int *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
rq->misfit_task_load = max(task_h_load(p), 1);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:891:19: note: expanded from macro 'max'
#define max(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, >)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:875:24: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:865:4: note: expanded from macro '__safe_cmp'
(__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:851:29: note: expanded from macro '__typecheck'
(!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:7662:11: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (task_h_load(p)) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') and 'typeof (1) *' (aka 'int *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
load = max(task_h_load(p), 1);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:891:19: note: expanded from macro 'max'
#define max(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, >)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:875:24: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp'
__builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:865:4: note: expanded from macro '__safe_cmp'
(__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/kernel.h:851:29: note: expanded from macro '__typecheck'
(!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:8180:19: warning: unused function 'check_misfit_status' [-Wunused-function]
static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
^
23 warnings generated.
vim +4056 kernel/sched/fair.c
4036
4037 static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
4038 {
4039 if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity))
4040 return;
4041
4042 if (!p) {
4043 rq->misfit_task_load = 0;
4044 return;
4045 }
4046
4047 if (task_fits_capacity(p, capacity_of(cpu_of(rq)))) {
4048 rq->misfit_task_load = 0;
4049 return;
4050 }
4051
4052 /*
4053 * Make sure that misfit_task_load will not be null even if
4054 * task_h_load() returns 0.
4055 */
> 4056 rq->misfit_task_load = max(task_h_load(p), 1);
4057 }
4058
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 25882 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202007101820.LWRXMbQL%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.