From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.1] file-posix: Mitigate file fragmentation with extent size hints
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200713131243.GB10318@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2974eb09-24fe-58b0-65d4-5cb550ed08f1@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4922 bytes --]
Am 13.07.2020 um 11:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 10.07.20 18:12, Max Reitz wrote:
> > On 07.07.20 18:17, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> Am 07.07.2020 um 16:23 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> >>> Espeically when O_DIRECT is used with image files so that the page cache
> >>> indirection can't cause a merge of allocating requests, the file will
> >>> fragment on the file system layer, with a potentially very small
> >>> fragment size (this depends on the requests the guest sent).
> >>>
> >>> On Linux, fragmentation can be reduced by setting an extent size hint
> >>> when creating the file (at least on XFS, it can't be set any more after
> >>> the first extent has been allocated), basically giving raw files a
> >>> "cluster size" for allocation.
> >>>
> >>> This adds an create option to set the extent size hint, and changes the
> >>> default from not setting a hint to setting it to 1 MB. The main reason
> >>> why qcow2 defaults to smaller cluster sizes is that COW becomes more
> >>> expensive, which is not an issue with raw files, so we can choose a
> >>> larger file. The tradeoff here is only potentially wasted disk space.
> >>>
> >>> For qcow2 (or other image formats) over file-posix, the advantage should
> >>> even be greater because they grow sequentially without leaving holes, so
> >>> there won't be wasted space. Setting even larger extent size hints for
> >>> such images may make sense. This can be done with the new option, but
> >>> let's keep the default conservative for now.
> >>>
> >>> The effect is very visible with a test that intentionally creates a
> >>> badly fragmented file with qemu-img bench (the time difference while
> >>> creating the file is already remarkable) and then looks at the number of
> >>> extents and the take a simple "qemu-img map" takes.
> >>>
> >>> Without an extent size hint:
> >>>
> >>> $ ./qemu-img create -f raw -o extent_size_hint=0 ~/tmp/test.raw 10G
> >>> Formatting '/home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw', fmt=raw size=10737418240 extent_size_hint=0
> >>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 0
> >>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 0, step size 8192)
> >>> Run completed in 25.848 seconds.
> >>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 4096
> >>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 4096, step size 8192)
> >>> Run completed in 19.616 seconds.
> >>> $ filefrag ~/tmp/test.raw
> >>> /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw: 2000000 extents found
> >>> $ time ./qemu-img map ~/tmp/test.raw
> >>> Offset Length Mapped to File
> >>> 0 0x1e8480000 0 /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw
> >>>
> >>> real 0m1,279s
> >>> user 0m0,043s
> >>> sys 0m1,226s
> >>>
> >>> With the new default extent size hint of 1 MB:
> >>>
> >>> $ ./qemu-img create -f raw -o extent_size_hint=1M ~/tmp/test.raw 10G
> >>> Formatting '/home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw', fmt=raw size=10737418240 extent_size_hint=1048576
> >>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 0
> >>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 0, step size 8192)
> >>> Run completed in 11.833 seconds.
> >>> $ ./qemu-img bench -f raw -t none -n -w ~/tmp/test.raw -c 1000000 -S 8192 -o 4096
> >>> Sending 1000000 write requests, 4096 bytes each, 64 in parallel (starting at offset 4096, step size 8192)
> >>> Run completed in 10.155 seconds.
> >>> $ filefrag ~/tmp/test.raw
> >>> /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw: 178 extents found
> >>> $ time ./qemu-img map ~/tmp/test.raw
> >>> Offset Length Mapped to File
> >>> 0 0x1e8480000 0 /home/kwolf/tmp/test.raw
> >>>
> >>> real 0m0,061s
> >>> user 0m0,040s
> >>> sys 0m0,014s
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> I also need to squash in a few trivial qemu-iotests updates, for which I
> >> won't send a v2:
> >
> > The additional specifications in 243 make it print a warning on tmpfs
> > (because the option doesn’t work there). I suppose the same may be true
> > on other filesystems as well. Should it be filtered out?
I guess we just shouldn't print a warning if the requested hint is 0.
> This patch also breaks 059, 106, and 175.
Hm, I was sure I had tested raw... Anyway, 059 should filter out the
actual size (how could this ever work?), and 175 is obvious, too - it
tries to be clever, but not clever enough.
106 is a bit mysterious because the error message implies that the
images end up smaller than before, which shouldn't be the case. I'll
have a look.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-13 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 14:23 [PATCH for-5.1] file-posix: Mitigate file fragmentation with extent size hints Kevin Wolf
2020-07-07 14:47 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-07 16:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-07-10 16:12 ` Max Reitz
2020-07-13 9:08 ` Max Reitz
2020-07-13 13:12 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2020-07-13 13:45 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200713131243.GB10318@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.