From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 2002:ac2:5042:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a2csp4041246lfm; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyozE6u0MyO1ksNzTQrrNfxzeR8g3uE8lildCtZaHJdw51jOQ3F4bfdntM0T6Em88AKMkdO X-Received: by 2002:a25:98c6:: with SMTP id m6mr6387174ybo.521.1594717087050; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594717087; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FRRYagxqculp2vzvtueezbnOV32WGK2GW8emdpqAxKlUtpuyMyHotZiCnVC6v+Tmik JJ9OZ43tl/vK+13CEePZQ1fRoYWf4r5DlVR5VqF7VAUETGKKgALSrxtmYzDN+2BzTcsf HIcZiO9ak2lBocBUiti3GqfThYioaTMgd2nRH0ORI6aCFM6ja6+TgjPCrJ0cY30Nmt3i m0EpCEVxN84VZ2uCaNMZ61I6y8crGywLxb5QLuuoTsB18cxZRuqkzuqRcrXTeqa5bmVU PM71qYnQdr8NHufEKbAuzxq3utBC9TWS6hjCX3iqwX5NJJLXa2Ilod/2wvuupBDcZmWr g4fQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-disposition:in-reply-to :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=d7qu47wrEa9Rra+uRd9zMX6T/4ahPlP/4qd4nYZVew8=; b=SQVNla799iM/7yEKd2ThOSyOosx2UMGPs+7GYE7eqNhIJU28+izBC4I1nx3GPqN1Tb xeIj3em29qrZkFIoWwTwejqffN4oQjXACM4saVy29N/RNwrJuECbpFT6v8pvN6hCslNR 37e7YzbnDpPhoKbBMcHL82KyVOaUvQUA3NuMEzxF/FLBPE54YRdrW3dfjHuhVVyfp8OJ O7BjcacuISTxs3sneiiILExzVTweXEjYBa7rLlEEXP3bj3dsDw8OeTdimlyISdcjE8e8 EX+Nf0D/dg4J0M/oGjgGmPVHyRCi8dg6Z2od+fMa/Y2llPfefDTr6UIssuMxxQAupZzd U4xw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=P81i2xbz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [209.51.188.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s88si17731290ybi.131.2020.07.14.01.58.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=P81i2xbz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([::1]:51744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvGlK-0001aH-FZ for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:58:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvGlD-0001ZQ-Mt for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:57:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:25776 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvGlB-0004zG-QF for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:57:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594717077; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d7qu47wrEa9Rra+uRd9zMX6T/4ahPlP/4qd4nYZVew8=; b=P81i2xbz3BrVotNUlcjiS+smS+TyyyxtdMNNsaiUR655Sw+QakK9ioEg6zSeZYTpQ3soGq Y5HQyjtiudYmdqQk3B1PVa/ddyTVNyZXx/izCBv24HRzugeJZuqzUx42/tdl1kihhT/keJ 31QfK3cg2uEVBeQ/YBXS0/wTYLTzgss= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-276-XVuNM8GhPRKcNgu80ep4dw-1; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:57:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XVuNM8GhPRKcNgu80ep4dw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id b8so20795180wro.19 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:57:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=d7qu47wrEa9Rra+uRd9zMX6T/4ahPlP/4qd4nYZVew8=; b=oy3K05VE+tCUJ+pNpVxirboLVDwE1b3jXnQxVsLJrPtXpIZKFgbODqNjq5Vs3Q20yN Q/vIwptlXnKcfCR/UrgRn8iC6XzLA3iGyheFdcAyrN+vrbjAxUvnBqL3iRkKXkt0qTIJ mfllY4l/RnVhNGH1y9gTtgPIBJaEm47Ob5HDrxrVYzf1gxOICwa1QQ11hApa4TbMPpS0 01H6yLeijGthLCibM92qEEYuYcNwqm9rPLLNas50gy11p5l2oLHby4q1UUev1y1a3geQ UDfPNf4hCKOo87sEvxVB5KW9p3WYUCH7w3oboDK6t1EE12/jwZ9Lzwm6UGR015EZ8LYo 7YHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VY60+bXKAiYlao9wAfSaQEhxt25gaedbGYZ3qAimnNSpjaS7a CyZtMcN00fscFEJ2R2PfUzN2WU1ZRlNyMf9350uQt7rgkeUncnZAn2b9zP3xpmORRUOeA42QwrE l7mCKCWXHqSJ/ X-Received: by 2002:adf:f885:: with SMTP id u5mr3894658wrp.402.1594717074222; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:57:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f885:: with SMTP id u5mr3894637wrp.402.1594717074006; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-180-10-140.red.bezeqint.net. [79.180.10.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm28837090wrp.45.2020.07.14.01.57.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:57:50 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Only expose flash on older machine types Message-ID: <20200714045537-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200629140938.17566-1-drjones@redhat.com> <20200629140938.17566-4-drjones@redhat.com> <20200713104907.335bf762@redhat.com> <20200714055109.owrlob6m53notzh3@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200714055109.owrlob6m53notzh3@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/14 01:42:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -40 X-Spam_score: -4.1 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, ard.biesheuvel@arm.com, Igor Mammedov , philmd@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: LQ1PP5IH6pfy On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:51:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:49:07AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:09:37 +0200 > > Andrew Jones wrote: > > > > > The flash device is exclusively for the host-controlled firmware, so > > > we should not expose it to the OS. Exposing it risks the OS messing > > > with it, which could break firmware runtime services and surprise the > > > OS when all its changes disappear after reboot. > > > > > > As firmware needs the device and uses DT, we leave the device exposed > > > there. It's up to firmware to remove the nodes from DT before sending > > > it on to the OS. However, there's no need to force firmware to remove > > > tables from ACPI (which it doesn't know how to do anyway), so we > > > simply don't add the tables in the first place. But, as we've been > > > adding the tables for quite some time and don't want to change the > > > default hardware exposed to versioned machines, then we only stop > > > exposing the flash device tables for 5.1 and later machine types. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel > > > Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones > > > --- > > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 5 ++++- > > > hw/arm/virt.c | 3 +++ > > > include/hw/arm/virt.h | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > > > index 1384a2cf2ab4..91f0df7b13a3 100644 > > > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > > > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > > > @@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ static void build_fadt_rev5(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, > > > static void > > > build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms) > > > { > > > + VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms); > > > Aml *scope, *dsdt; > > > MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms); > > > const MemMapEntry *memmap = vms->memmap; > > > @@ -767,7 +768,9 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms) > > > acpi_dsdt_add_cpus(scope, vms->smp_cpus); > > > acpi_dsdt_add_uart(scope, &memmap[VIRT_UART], > > > (irqmap[VIRT_UART] + ARM_SPI_BASE)); > > > - acpi_dsdt_add_flash(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FLASH]); > > > + if (vmc->acpi_expose_flash) { > > > + acpi_dsdt_add_flash(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FLASH]); > > > + } > > > acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG]); > > > acpi_dsdt_add_virtio(scope, &memmap[VIRT_MMIO], > > > (irqmap[VIRT_MMIO] + ARM_SPI_BASE), NUM_VIRTIO_TRANSPORTS); > > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > > > index cd0834ce7faf..5adc9ff799ef 100644 > > > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > > > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > > > @@ -2482,9 +2482,12 @@ DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE_AS_LATEST(5, 1) > > > > > > static void virt_machine_5_0_options(MachineClass *mc) > > > { > > > + VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_CLASS(OBJECT_CLASS(mc)); > > > + > > > virt_machine_5_1_options(mc); > > > compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_5_0, hw_compat_5_0_len); > > > mc->numa_mem_supported = true; > > > + vmc->acpi_expose_flash = true; > > > > we usually do not version ACPI tables changes > > (unless we have a good reason to do so) > > Even when the change is to remove the exposure of hardware from the guest? > Before this change, if a guest looked, it had a flash, after this change, > if a guest looks, it doesn't. It's up to the relevant maintainers who know what the semantics are. FYI ACPI tables only change across a reset though. So it's a question of whether guests get confused even if this changes after a reboot. Versioning is generally safer, but it's a good idea to document the motivation for it. > I'd feel much better versioning a change > like that, than not. > > Thanks, > drew > > > > > > } > > > DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE(5, 0) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > > > index 31878ddc7223..c65be5fe0bb6 100644 > > > --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h > > > +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > > > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ typedef struct { > > > bool no_highmem_ecam; > > > bool no_ged; /* Machines < 4.2 has no support for ACPI GED device */ > > > bool kvm_no_adjvtime; > > > + bool acpi_expose_flash; > > > } VirtMachineClass; > > > > > > typedef struct { > > > >