diff for duplicates of <20200714082516.GZ2571@kadam>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index ef7c78c..986ae16 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:39:13AM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
 > > list_for_each_entry() loops without hitting a break statement but they
 > > don't work.
 > > 
-> > In the first loop, we increment "i" after the "if (i = unit)" condition
+> > In the first loop, we increment "i" after the "if (i == unit)" condition
 > > so we don't necessarily know that "i" is not equal to unit at the end of
 > > the loop.
 > So, if I understand this right, this would only really be a problem if
-> there's no list entries at all, right? That is i = unit = 0.
+> there's no list entries at all, right? That is i == unit == 0.
 > Not sure if that can actually happen, but in any case the fix looks correct.
 
 An empty list and there is another potential issue where unit is exactly
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ off by one.
 
 	list_for_each_entry(con, &dev_priv->dev->mode_config.connector_list,
 			    head) {
-		if (i = unit)
+		if (i == unit)
 			break;
 		++i;  <-- this is the last iteration and it's off by one
-			  so now i = unit but we didn't exit via the
+			  so now i == unit but we didn't exit via the
 			  break statement.
 	}
 
@@ -35,3 +35,8 @@ Technically correct is the best kind of correct!  ;)
 
 regards,
 dan carpenter
+
+_______________________________________________
+dri-devel mailing list
+dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
+https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9a62188..b9a0c71 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\077f0761a-11e6-e321-2245-700258d54924@vmware.com\0"
  "From\0Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix two list_for_each loop exit tests\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:25:16 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:25:16 +0300\0"
  "To\0Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>\0"
  "Cc\0David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>"
   kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
  "> > list_for_each_entry() loops without hitting a break statement but they\n"
  "> > don't work.\n"
  "> > \n"
- "> > In the first loop, we increment \"i\" after the \"if (i = unit)\" condition\n"
+ "> > In the first loop, we increment \"i\" after the \"if (i == unit)\" condition\n"
  "> > so we don't necessarily know that \"i\" is not equal to unit at the end of\n"
  "> > the loop.\n"
  "> So, if I understand this right, this would only really be a problem if\n"
- "> there's no list entries at all, right? That is i = unit = 0.\n"
+ "> there's no list entries at all, right? That is i == unit == 0.\n"
  "> Not sure if that can actually happen, but in any case the fix looks correct.\n"
  "\n"
  "An empty list and there is another potential issue where unit is exactly\n"
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@
  "\n"
  "\tlist_for_each_entry(con, &dev_priv->dev->mode_config.connector_list,\n"
  "\t\t\t    head) {\n"
- "\t\tif (i = unit)\n"
+ "\t\tif (i == unit)\n"
  "\t\t\tbreak;\n"
  "\t\t++i;  <-- this is the last iteration and it's off by one\n"
- "\t\t\t  so now i = unit but we didn't exit via the\n"
+ "\t\t\t  so now i == unit but we didn't exit via the\n"
  "\t\t\t  break statement.\n"
  "\t}\n"
  "\n"
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@
  "Technically correct is the best kind of correct!  ;)\n"
  "\n"
  "regards,\n"
- dan carpenter
+ "dan carpenter\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "dri-devel mailing list\n"
+ "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org\n"
+ https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
 
-4157b4e0c922f9ba42795b580adb1028ae365810bb3351cca44de92e1c297915
+b95ab42fc31e4f8d7d8698955c0d7c6cc1eb13093f81b1ff33f789e790b49496
