From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Tomasz Piatkowski" <tomasz.piatkowski@ericsson.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Retrieving lcore worker thread id
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:51:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714135138.136f2a56@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0802MB2216D42FE32A9BC0FD071A3F98610@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 18:59:59 +0000
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > >
> > > Hi.
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > > In DPDK 19.11, the lcore_config struct of <rte_lcore.h> is made
> > > private, and with it the possibility to look up the thread id of the
> > > lcore worker threads disappears.
> > >
> > > One use case is an application with a monitoring function (on some
> > > control plane thread), which uses the thread ids to make sure the
> > > worker threads gets the CPU runtime they should, and thus is able to
> > > detect stalls.
> This sounds similar to 'keep alive' functionality.
>
> > >
> > > Is there some other way of finding out the thread_id of a lcore worker
> > > thread? All I can think of are hacks like using a temporary service
> > > function for service cores, in combination with requiring launched
> > > application threads also to store their thread id in some global
> > > structure (index by lcore_id).
> >
> > -1 for the service cores idea. I like the creative solution thinking, but not as a
> > long-term solution.
> >
> > > Is there some cleaner way? If not, would adding something like a
> > > rte_lcore_thread_id() function make sense?
> I guess here you mean the OS provided thread ID. Are there OS calls that provide the CPU runtime?
This might be difficult sinc thread id in Linux/glibc is intentionally and opaque value.
According to Posix the only valid way to look at it is to use return value from
pthread_create() and pthread_self().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-14 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 12:03 [dpdk-dev] Retrieving lcore worker thread id Mattias Rönnblom
2020-07-14 13:08 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-07-14 18:59 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-14 20:51 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-07-15 10:17 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-07-15 16:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-16 10:20 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-08-10 9:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] eal: introduce function to get lcore " Mattias Rönnblom
2020-10-20 13:38 ` David Marchand
2020-10-20 18:40 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-07-15 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] Retrieving lcore worker " Mattias Rönnblom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200714135138.136f2a56@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=tomasz.piatkowski@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.