All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:18:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717081852.GA23732@laureti-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:10:44PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> However, i'm having trouble understanding how PHYs actually work in
> this driver. 
> 
> We have:
> 
> struct ksz_port {
>         u16 member;
>         u16 vid_member;
>         int stp_state;
>         struct phy_device phydev;
> 
> with an instance of this structure per port of the switch.
> 
> And it is this phydev which you are manipulating.
> 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> > +		/* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> > +		phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> > +				     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> > +
> > +		/* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> > +		if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> > +			phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> > +					     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> 
> But how is this phydev associated with the netdev? I don't see how
> phylink_connect_phy() is called using this phydev structure?

The ksz* drivers are implemented using the DSA framework. The relevant
phylink_connect_phy call is issued by the DSA infrastructure. We can see
this (and its ordering relative to phy_remove_link_mode after my patch)
using ftrace by adding the following to the kernel command line:

    trace_options=func_stack_trace ftrace=function ftrace_filter=phylink_connect_phy,phy_remove_link_mode

I've added the trace buffer to the end of this mail to avoid cluttering
it. The key takeaways are:
 * phylink_connect_phy is called by dsa_slave_create. A few inlined
   functions later we arrive at dsa_register_switch, which is called
   during driver probe.
 * All phy_remove_link_mode calls now happen before any
   phylink_connect_phy calls as requested.

Helmut

----8<-----8<------
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 10/10   #P:2
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |
       swapper/0-1     [000] ....     7.166645: phy_remove_link_mode <-macb_probe
       swapper/0-1     [000] ....     7.166654: <stack trace>
 => macb_probe
 => platform_drv_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => device_driver_attach
 => __driver_attach
 => bus_for_each_dev
 => driver_attach
 => bus_add_driver
 => driver_register
 => __platform_driver_register
 => macb_driver_init
 => do_one_initcall
 => kernel_init_freeable
 => kernel_init
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592479: phy_remove_link_mode <-ksz9477_setup
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592489: <stack trace>
 => ksz9477_setup
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592494: phy_remove_link_mode <-ksz9477_setup
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592498: <stack trace>
 => ksz9477_setup
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.604375: phylink_connect_phy <-dsa_slave_create
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.604383: <stack trace>
 => dsa_slave_create
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] .n..     7.623675: phylink_connect_phy <-dsa_slave_create
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] .n..     7.623685: <stack trace>
 => dsa_slave_create
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
---->8----->8------

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14  8:25 [PATCH] net: phy: phy_remove_link_mode should not advertise new modes Helmut Grohne
2020-07-14 21:07 ` David Miller
2020-07-15  7:03   ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-15 18:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-15 19:01       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 18:51     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 19:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-16 12:57   ` [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe Helmut Grohne
2020-07-16 14:10     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-17  8:18       ` Helmut Grohne [this message]
2020-07-17 13:18         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-20  9:04           ` [PATCH v3] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-20 20:43             ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 11:07               ` [PATCH v4] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-21 15:20                 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 22:50                 ` David Miller
2020-07-20 21:04             ` [PATCH v3] " Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21  7:38               ` Helmut Grohne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717081852.GA23732@laureti-dev \
    --to=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.