From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/sve: First steps towards optimizing syscalls
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:44:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720104438.GH30452@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715171116.GK5431@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 06:11:16PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 05:49:34PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > I wonder whether we ought to accompany this with a crude mechanism to
> > choose dynamically between setting TIF_SVE_NEEDS_FLUSH and keeping the
> > old behaviour.
>
> > My concern with doing this unconditionally has been that we can end up
> > with TIF_SVE permanently stuck on, which increases the per-task overhead.
> > This is not a worry if the user task really does use SVE once per
> > context switch, but not so good if, say, the libc startup probes for
> > SVE to initialise some internal logic but the task otherwise doesn't
> > use it. (This is just a worry: I haven't looked for evidence to support
> > it.)
>
> Yes, it's a concern. My thought was to follow this up with something
> which copies what some of the other architectures are doing for FP
> registers and go back to the existing behaviour after a certain number
> of syscalls. That has a bunch of room for debate and bikeshedding about
> what exactly an appropriate number might be of course.
Ack, that sounds like a fair approach.
Of course, we could try to implement some kind of clever backoff but
it's probably not worth it for now.
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 13:35 [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/sve: First steps towards optimizing syscalls Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] arm64/fpsimd: Update documentation of do_sve_acc Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64/signal: Update the comment in preserve_sve_context Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64/fpsimdmacros: Allow the macro "for" to be used in more cases Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] arm64/fpsimdmacros: Introduce a macro to update ZCR_EL1.LEN Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] arm64/sve: Implement a helper to flush SVE registers Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] arm64/sve: Implement a helper to load SVE registers from FPSIMD state Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] arm64/sve: Don't disable SVE on syscalls return Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-08-21 21:54 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] arm64/sve: Rework SVE trap access to use TIF_SVE_NEEDS_FLUSH Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-15 16:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/sve: First steps towards optimizing syscalls Dave Martin
2020-07-15 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-20 10:44 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2020-07-21 2:43 ` zhang.lei
2020-07-21 22:34 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200720104438.GH30452@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=Daniel.Kiss@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.