From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
saravanak@google.com
Subject: Re: stable-rc 5.4: arm build failed: arm-init.c:327:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_dev_from_fwnode’
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:24:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720152407.GA1381945@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a24UWMoH9775FD3++Uwp1O-9gJkjoiq0M21RLZoe7TxbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:46 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > arm build failed on stable-rc 5.4 branch.
> >
> > make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j32 ARCH=arm
> > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache
> > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage
> > #
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c: In function ‘efifb_add_links’:
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:327:12: error: implicit declaration
> > of function ‘get_dev_from_fwnode’
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 327 | sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(&sup_np->fwnode);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:327:10: warning: assignment to
> > ‘struct device *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > [-Wint-conversion]
> > 327 | sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(&sup_np->fwnode);
> > | ^
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c: At top level:
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:352:3: error: ‘const struct
> > fwnode_operations’ has no member named ‘add_links’
> > 352 | .add_links = efifb_add_links,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:352:15: error: initialization of
> > ‘struct fwnode_handle * (*)(struct fwnode_handle *)’ from incompatible
> > pointer type ‘int (*)(const struct fwnode_handle *, struct device *)’
> > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 352 | .add_links = efifb_add_links,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:352:15: note: (near initialization
> > for ‘efifb_fwnode_ops.get’)
> >
> >
> > seems like this is coming from the below patch
> > --
> > efi/arm: Defer probe of PCIe backed efifb on DT systems
> > [ Upstream commit 64c8a0cd0a535891d5905c3a1651150f0f141439 ]
> >
> > The new of_devlink support breaks PCIe probing on ARM platforms booting
> > via UEFI if the firmware exposes a EFI framebuffer that is backed by a
> > PCI device. The reason is that the probing order gets reversed,
> > resulting in a resource conflict on the framebuffer memory window when
> > the PCIe probes last, causing it to give up entirely.
> >
> > Given that we rely on PCI quirks to deal with EFI framebuffers that get
> > moved around in memory, we cannot simply drop the memory reservation, so
> > instead, let's use the device link infrastructure to register this
> > dependency, and force the probing to occur in the expected order.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113172245.27925-9-ardb@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>
> It seems that the stable kernels need a backport of commit 372a67c0c5ef
> ("driver core: Add fwnode_to_dev() to look up device from fwnode") as well.
Ick, really?
I think we should just drop the efi patch as if it relying on device
link, that is only in newer kernels.
I'll go do that now, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 14:46 stable-rc 5.4: arm build failed: arm-init.c:327:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_dev_from_fwnode’ Naresh Kamboju
2020-07-20 14:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-07-20 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-20 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-07-20 15:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200720152407.GA1381945@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.