From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of secret types
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:12:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724091245.GC3146350@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723185006.GR1274972@habkost.net>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:50:06PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:14:09PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > This introduces the use of the OBJECT_DEFINE and OBJECT_DECLARE macro
> > families in the secret types, in order to eliminate boilerplate code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > crypto/secret.c | 24 ++++--------------------
> > crypto/secret_common.c | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> > crypto/secret_keyring.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> > include/crypto/secret.h | 11 ++---------
> > include/crypto/secret_common.h | 13 ++-----------
> > include/crypto/secret_keyring.h | 18 ++----------------
> > 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Beautiful.
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to automate this. I'm assuming
> Coccinelle won't be able to deal with the macro definitions, but
> a handwritten conversion script would be really useful for
> dealing with our 1226 static TypeInfo structs.
Probably possible to do a reasonably good job with a perl script or
similar. The code patterns to be replaced are reasonably easy to
identify with a few regexes.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 18:14 [PATCH 0/4] qom: reduce boilerplate required for declaring and defining objects Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] qom: make object_ref/unref use a void * instead of Object * Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:04 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-24 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] qom: provide convenient macros for declaring and defining types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:23 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-24 9:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-09 4:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-08-11 18:22 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of secret types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 18:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-24 9:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2020-08-06 18:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-08-07 11:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-08 1:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-23 19:25 ` Eric Blake
2020-07-23 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] crypto: use QOM macros for declaration/definition of TLS creds types Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-23 19:26 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724091245.GC3146350@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.