Re: kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:LINE!

["Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:49:04PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:13:11PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 03:37:44PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:11:31 +0300 Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:51:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:10:19 -0700 syzbot wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > HEAD commit:    4c43049f Add linux-next specific files for 20200716
> > > > > > git tree:       linux-next
> > > > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12c56087100000
> > > > > > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2c76d72659687242
> > > > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c48f34012b06c4ac67dd
> > > > > > compiler:       gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
> > > > > > syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1344abeb100000
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+c48f34012b06c4ac67dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > __handle_mm_fault
> > > > >   ->pmd_migration_entry_wait
> > > > >     ->migration_entry_to_page
> > > > > 
> > > > > stumbled onto an unlocked page.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't immediately see a cause.  Perhaps Matthew's "THP prep patches",
> > > > > perhaps something else.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is it possible to perform a bisection?
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe it's related to the new lock_page_async()?
> > > 
> > > Or is there likely the window that after copy_huge_pmd() the src pmd migrate
> > > entry is removed and the page unlocked but the dst is not?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > copy_huge_pmd() runs with exclusive mmap_lock on the source side and
> > destination side is not running yet.
> 
> The one I'm hitting is huge related though.
> 
> I added this debug:
> 
> +++ b/include/linux/swapops.h
> @@ -165,8 +165,9 @@ static inline struct page *device_private_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>  static inline swp_entry_t make_migration_entry(struct page *page, int write)
>  {
> -       BUG_ON(!PageLocked(compound_head(page)));
> +       VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
>  
> +if (PageCompound(page)) printk("pfn %lx order %d\n", page_to_pfn(page), thp_order(thp_head(page)));
>         return swp_entry(write ? SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE : SWP_MIGRATION_READ,
>                         page_to_pfn(page));
>  }
> @@ -194,7 +195,11 @@ static inline struct page *migration_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry)
>          * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the
>          * corresponding page is locked
>          */
> -       BUG_ON(!PageLocked(compound_head(p)));
> +       if (!PageLocked(p)) {
> +               dump_page(p, "not locked");
> +               printk("swap entry %d.%lx\n", swp_type(entry), swp_offset(entry));
> +               BUG();
> +       }
>         return p;
>  }
>  
> 
> and got useful output (while running generic/086):
> 
> 1457 086 (20181): drop_caches: 3
> 1457 page:00000000a216ae9a refcount:2 mapcount:0 mapping:000000009ba7bfed index:0x2227 pfn:0x229e7
> 1457 aops:def_blk_aops ino:0
> 1457 flags: 0x4000000000002030(lru|active|private)
> 1457 raw: 4000000000002030 fffff5b4416b5a48 fffff5b4408a7988 ffff9e9c34848578
> 1457 raw: 0000000000002227 ffff9e9bd18f0d00 00000002ffffffff 0000000000000000
> 1457 page dumped because: not locked
> 1457 swap entry 30.229e7
> 1457 ------------[ cut here ]------------
> 1457 kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:201!
> 1457 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> 1457 CPU: 3 PID: 646 Comm: check Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W         5.8.0-rc6-00067-gd8b18bdf9870-dirty #355
> 1457 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014
> 1457 RIP: 0010:__migration_entry_wait+0x109/0x110
> [...]
> 
> Looking back in the trace, I see:
> 
> ...
> 1457 pfn 229e5 order 9
> 1457 pfn 229e6 order 9
> 1457 pfn 229e7 order 9
> 1457 pfn 229e8 order 9
> 1457 pfn 229e9 order 9
> ...
> 
> so I would say we have a refcount problem.  I've probably made it worse by
> creating more THPs, but I don't think I'm the originator of the problem.
> 
> I know very little about the migration code today.  I suspect I'm going
> to have to learn about it next week.

It would be interesting to know if the migration entires ever got removed
for pfn. I mean if remove_migration_pte() got called for it.

It can be rmap issue too. Maybe it misses PMD on remove_migration_ptes()
or something.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov