From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A4DC433E0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D3C206D7 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="iUPdUzqq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7D3C206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0L6a-0006RJ-7G; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:37:00 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0L6Y-0006RE-8O for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:36:58 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 7e847996-d0ad-11ea-a87d-12813bfff9fa Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.144]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 7e847996-d0ad-11ea-a87d-12813bfff9fa; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:36:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1595925416; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Wt+2Rk35DFsivT+PLFZ3saMbD9lTBuqwKxEAHavAZuY=; b=iUPdUzqqDVpvJNZfyxLd57jeG5fE+9oN2+00Y6DO8tZ+/QFss8lTDcV8 zJA75F4UFOEipTxXIciydcGvn5Z4pKjudXHahaIPT+oYQJkdfUcE9htjq 944CgToN7mkHNn9u1BIkJmebA5MExBoYGmqCdp98m1mEWw7ppDVuU7kzG o=; Authentication-Results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: 0RJBp9F2bSyi1xbHsn216+P/WXCsxqXqn75hjXrC2Ufa+TSCdT/qbopDLbeouxi7+80fFIoQ3H PdPNQtcl6sGFrYrPxGRyHxJXQUi80hgmIu5J4jhAzE/3jh+sxheShwvfw+GKPRU+p5xirb22FB qYrT84PzYRALE+kXc5qmGYeeFsYbeNr3EMM16Hf4KiiN0vIPjRLPhydeokA8UOjipG4MXLF6xH OkjevtsFDvh+qUsxz+ol3RKoyYEGjM7gXVltt3VWp3Cz+kCtQEIQP8FexrhmLps/PXN5nUIFLr iBU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 24191433 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,405,1589256000"; d="scan'208";a="24191433" Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:36:49 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: reduce CET-SS related #ifdef-ary Message-ID: <20200728083649.GX7191@Air-de-Roger> References: <58b9211a-f6dd-85da-d0bd-c927ac537a5d@suse.com> <58615a18-7f81-c000-d499-1a49f4752879@suse.com> <20200727150002.GS7191@Air-de-Roger> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.69.22.113) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Wei Liu , Andrew Cooper Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:50:23PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 27.07.2020 17:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:48:46PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Should the setssbsy be quoted, or it doesn't matter? I'm asking > > because the same construction used by CLAC/STAC doesn't quote the > > instruction. > > I actually thought we consistently quote these. It doesn't matter > as long as it's a single word. Quoting becomes necessary when > there are e.g. blanks involved, which happens for insns with > operands. Could you quote the usages in patch 1 please then in order to be consistent? Thanks, Roger.