From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF93C433E1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0FD206D4 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726710AbgG2IXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:23:15 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:12855 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726336AbgG2IXO (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:23:14 -0400 IronPort-SDR: UnH1EuRFBqFhH+RP/MBPEUlE8ih3XeKwSHXD5972M967ywkOQUaSp8LzdPzuKpgkz9EgsNsv4j ENhXsWWEXLQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9696"; a="149220918" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="149220918" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:10 -0700 IronPort-SDR: YgJufAO+VvF9JKj6/+berwFwFFx7I/v9sC+BOqWhjeM/8QDTXBVydKe5VTSCIvoI3d37MtIoD+ Ak99Hp7bBZNw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="322479903" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:06 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k0hMf-004eRE-VX; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thierry Reding Cc: Hans de Goede , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mika Westerberg , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] acpi/pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Message-ID: <20200729082305.GK3703480@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200717133753.127282-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > I've applied patches 3 through 12 to the PWM tree. I thought it was a > bit odd that only a handful of these patches had been reviewed and there > were no Tested-bys, but I'm going to trust that you know what you're > doing. =) If this breaks things for anyone I'm sure they'll complain. Can we postpone a bit? > That said I see that Rafael has acked patches 1-2 and Jani did so for > patches 13-16. I'm not sure if you expect me to pick those patches up as > well. As far as I can tell the ACPI, PWM and DRM parts are all > independent, so these patches could be applied to the corresponding > subsystem trees. > > Anyway, if you want me to pick those all up into the PWM tree, I suppose > that's something I can do as well. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB7DC433DF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804BA2070B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:18:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 804BA2070B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A41C6E879; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C8D89956; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:10 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: lN49fUhDHhOGJb35aRB5D9h6y4C5eMO5hIFS3nBQ2Xa0Cy8Lsh/RBpVDeHizAOMrEfffmpv/pK RF8oa7qOWclQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9696"; a="236242771" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="236242771" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:10 -0700 IronPort-SDR: YgJufAO+VvF9JKj6/+berwFwFFx7I/v9sC+BOqWhjeM/8QDTXBVydKe5VTSCIvoI3d37MtIoD+ Ak99Hp7bBZNw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="322479903" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:06 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k0hMf-004eRE-VX; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] acpi/pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Message-ID: <20200729082305.GK3703480@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200717133753.127282-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:16:49 +0000 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Hans de Goede , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Mika Westerberg , Len Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > I've applied patches 3 through 12 to the PWM tree. I thought it was a > bit odd that only a handful of these patches had been reviewed and there > were no Tested-bys, but I'm going to trust that you know what you're > doing. =) If this breaks things for anyone I'm sure they'll complain. Can we postpone a bit? > That said I see that Rafael has acked patches 1-2 and Jani did so for > patches 13-16. I'm not sure if you expect me to pick those patches up as > well. As far as I can tell the ACPI, PWM and DRM parts are all > independent, so these patches could be applied to the corresponding > subsystem trees. > > Anyway, if you want me to pick those all up into the PWM tree, I suppose > that's something I can do as well. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF03CC433DF for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAECA206D4 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CAECA206D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F32189956; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C8D89956; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:23:10 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: lN49fUhDHhOGJb35aRB5D9h6y4C5eMO5hIFS3nBQ2Xa0Cy8Lsh/RBpVDeHizAOMrEfffmpv/pK RF8oa7qOWclQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9696"; a="236242771" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="236242771" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:10 -0700 IronPort-SDR: YgJufAO+VvF9JKj6/+berwFwFFx7I/v9sC+BOqWhjeM/8QDTXBVydKe5VTSCIvoI3d37MtIoD+ Ak99Hp7bBZNw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,409,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="322479903" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2020 01:23:06 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k0hMf-004eRE-VX; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:23:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thierry Reding Message-ID: <20200729082305.GK3703480@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200717133753.127282-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200727074120.GB2781612@ulmo> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 00/16] acpi/pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Mika Westerberg , Len Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > I've applied patches 3 through 12 to the PWM tree. I thought it was a > bit odd that only a handful of these patches had been reviewed and there > were no Tested-bys, but I'm going to trust that you know what you're > doing. =) If this breaks things for anyone I'm sure they'll complain. Can we postpone a bit? > That said I see that Rafael has acked patches 1-2 and Jani did so for > patches 13-16. I'm not sure if you expect me to pick those patches up as > well. As far as I can tell the ACPI, PWM and DRM parts are all > independent, so these patches could be applied to the corresponding > subsystem trees. > > Anyway, if you want me to pick those all up into the PWM tree, I suppose > that's something I can do as well. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx